205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16212581)
1. Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2-year study.
Del Pizzo M; Zucchelli G; Modica F; Villa R; Debernardi C
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):1181-7. PubMed ID: 16212581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronally advanced flap in combination with acellular dermal matrix with or without enamel matrix derivatives for root coverage.
Pourabbas R; Chitsazi MT; Kosarieh E; Olyaee P
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 19884716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of anatomical features on the outcome of gingival recessions treated with coronally advanced flap and enamel matrix derivative: a 1-year prospective study.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Basso M; Weinstein RL
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 15948683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years.
McGuire MK; Scheyer ET; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):1353-62. PubMed ID: 22348698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enamel matrix derivative and coronal flaps to cover marginal tissue recessions.
Castellanos A; de la Rosa M; de la Garza M; Caffesse RG
J Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 77(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16579697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage of Miller class I and II recession defects using enamel matrix proteins versus coronally advanced flap technique: a 2-year report.
Spahr A; Haegewald S; Tsoulfidou F; Rompola E; Heijl L; Bernimoulin JP; Ring C; Sander S; Haller B
J Periodontol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1871-80. PubMed ID: 16274306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year follow-up study.
Leknes KN; Amarante ES; Price DE; Bøe OE; Skavland RJ; Lie T
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):518-29. PubMed ID: 15842269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical restoration and the amount of soft tissue coverage achieved by coronally advanced flap: a 2-year follow-up randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Santamaria MP; da Silva Feitosa D; Nociti FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 19419445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of the long term results of root coverage with connective tissue graft or enamel matrix protein: 24-month results.
Abolfazli N; Saleh-Saber F; Eskandari A; Lafzi A
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E304-9. PubMed ID: 19300369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of coronally advanced flaps with and without the addition of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of marginal tissue recession.
Cueva MA; Boltchi FE; Hallmon WW; Nunn ME; Rivera-Hidalgo F; Rees T
J Periodontol; 2004 Jul; 75(7):949-56. PubMed ID: 15341352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-mouth comparison of a coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for coverage of multiple gingival recession defects: 6- and 24-month follow-up.
Cordaro L; di Torresanto VM; Torsello F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Feb; 32(1):e10-20. PubMed ID: 22254230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of enamel matrix derivative on collagen guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage procedure.
Trabulsi M; Oh TJ; Eber R; Weber D; Wang HL
J Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 75(11):1446-57. PubMed ID: 15633319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation.
Pilloni A; Paolantonio M; Camargo PM
J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):2031-9. PubMed ID: 17209788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial.
Roman A; Soancă A; Kasaj A; Stratul SI
J Periodontal Res; 2013 Oct; 48(5):563-72. PubMed ID: 23317049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sling and tag suturing technique for coronally advanced flap.
Huang LH; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2007 Aug; 27(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 17726994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
