152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1621325)
1. [Administration of an HIV contaminated blood unit and hospital liability].
Ehmke W; Bielefeld ; Haike HJ
Versicherungsmedizin; 1992 Jun; 44(3):76-80. PubMed ID: 1621325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Blood transfusions. Illinois Supreme Court grants blood bank a new trial.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Jan; 12(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 12162261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal clock begins tolling at plaintiff's suspicion of harm.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Apr; 11(6):5. PubMed ID: 11363281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Synopsis of the newest regulations for hemotherapy: consequences for physicians and hospital insurance].
Hanfland P
Infusionsther Transfusionsmed; 1993 Jun; 20(3):70-4. PubMed ID: 8364331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Canadian Red Cross found negligent.
Kondro W
Lancet; 1997 Oct; 350(9085):1154. PubMed ID: 9343513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital professional liability.
Cahill W
Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(4):449-59. PubMed ID: 10124090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Agent liability: a law in flux].
Hardy J
Transfus Clin Biol; 2000 Feb; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 10730345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking blood shield statutes in view of the hepatitis C pandemic and other emerging threats to the blood supply.
Rueda A
J Health Law; 2001; 34(3):419-58. PubMed ID: 11571894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "For any shortcomings on the part of the Red Cross, we are deeply sorry".
Davey M; Perrault R
CMAJ; 1997 Aug; 157(3):245-6. PubMed ID: 9269188
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "For any shortcomings on the part of the Red Cross, we are deeply sorry".
Normand A
CMAJ; 1997 Aug; 157(3):245; author reply 246. PubMed ID: 9269187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Surrogate testing was not required under blood shield law.
AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Feb; 13(3):2. PubMed ID: 11365104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Product liability for defective blood.
Newdick C
Haematologia (Budap); 1994; 26(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 7959375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Contamination of the blood supply in the 1980s and 1990s.
Pozen A
Ann Intern Med; 2003 Jan; 138(1):78-9. PubMed ID: 12513058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Blood bank trade group held liable for HIV-tainted transfusion.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Jun; 11(12):1, 10-1. PubMed ID: 11363570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decision on contaminated blood restates that providing blood is a service, not a sale.
Decker R
Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Apr; 14(4):18-9. PubMed ID: 10292835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Florida court asked to decide legality of limiting suits.
AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Jun; 11(11):5. PubMed ID: 11363564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital and blood bank liability to patients who contract AIDS through blood transfusions.
Greif RC
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1987 Dec; 9(6):7-28. PubMed ID: 10285120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. HIV-related information and the tension between confidentiality and liberal discovery. The need for a uniform approach.
Colella U
J Leg Med; 1995 Mar; 16(1):33-100. PubMed ID: 7738441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. VA hospital settles HIV transfusion suit for $595,000.
AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Sep; 12(16):4. PubMed ID: 11364667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liability without fault and the AIDS plague compel a new approach to cases of transfusion-transmitted disease.
Baker AF
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Aug; (150):7-40. PubMed ID: 10112801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
