These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16213537)

  • 1. Attenuation coefficient estimation using experimental diffraction corrections with multiple interface reflections.
    Lerch TP; Cepel R; Neal SP
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Jan; 44(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16213537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correction for partial reflection in ultrasonic attenuation measurements using contact transducers.
    Treiber M; Kim JY; Jacobs LJ; Qu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):2946-53. PubMed ID: 19425638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diffraction correction methods for insertion ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Xu W; Kaufman JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 8262538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method to identify acoustic reverberation in multilayered homogeneous media.
    Duarte MA; Machado JC; Pereira WC
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Mar; 41(9):683-98. PubMed ID: 14996528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic methods for obtaining the pressure reflection coefficient from a buffer rod based measurement cell.
    Bjørndal E; Frøysa KE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1781-93. PubMed ID: 18986921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of diffraction effect in ultrasonic attenuation by through-transmission substitution technique.
    Xing G; Yang P; He L
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Apr; 53(4):825-30. PubMed ID: 23290825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic method for obtaining the pressure reflection coefficient using a half-wave layer.
    Liu JX; Wang ZQ; Li GF; Wang NH
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Apr; 51(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 21134687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative estimation of ultrasonic attenuation in a solid in the immersion case with correction of diffraction effects.
    Wu P; Stepinski T
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):481-5. PubMed ID: 10829709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Receiver calibration and the nonlinearity parameter measurement of thick solid samples with diffraction and attenuation corrections.
    Jeong H; Barnard D; Cho S; Zhang S; Li X
    Ultrasonics; 2017 Nov; 81():147-157. PubMed ID: 28692853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the validity and improvement of the ultrasonic pulse-echo immersion technique to measure real attenuation.
    Goñi MA; Rousseau CE
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 23998204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defect characterization using an ultrasonic array to measure the scattering coefficient matrix.
    Zhang J; Drinkwater BW; Wilcox PD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2254-65. PubMed ID: 18986873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel approach to acoustic liquid density measurements using a buffer rod based measuring cell.
    Bjørndal E; Frøysa KE; Engeseth SA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Aug; 55(8):1794-808. PubMed ID: 18986922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Model-based estimation of thin multi-layered media using ultrasonic measurements.
    Hägglund F; Martinsson J; Carlson JE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Aug; 56(8):1689-702. PubMed ID: 19686984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration of focused ultrasonic transducers and absolute measurements of fluid nonlinearity with diffraction and attenuation corrections.
    Li X; Zhang S; Jeong H; Cho S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):984. PubMed ID: 28863570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative in vivo measurements of inner ear tissue resistivities: I. In vitro characterization.
    Suesserman MF; Spelman FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Oct; 40(10):1032-47. PubMed ID: 8294128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the viscosity-density product using multiple reflections of ultrasonic shear horizontal waves.
    Greenwood MS; Adamson JD; Bond LJ
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e1031-6. PubMed ID: 16793108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observations of the R reflector and sediment interface reflection at the Shallow Water '06 Central Site.
    Choi JW; Dahl PH; Goff JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 19045554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diffraction aperture non-ideal behaviour of air coupled transducers array elements designed for NDT.
    Prego Borges JL; Montero de Espinosa F; Salazar J; Garcia-Alvarez J; Chávez JA; Turó A; Garcia-Hernandez MJ
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e667-72. PubMed ID: 16797644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.