BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16213624)

  • 1. "Yes", "No" or "Yes, but"? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making.
    Dakin HA; Devlin NJ; Odeyemi IA
    Health Policy; 2006 Aug; 77(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 16213624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context.
    Cerri KH; Knapp M; Fernández JL
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2014 Apr; 9(2):119-41. PubMed ID: 23688554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.
    Claxton K; Palmer S; Longworth L; Bojke L; Griffin S; McKenna C; Soares M; Spackman E; Youn J
    Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(46):1-323. PubMed ID: 23177626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When does NICE recommend the use of health technologies within a programme of evidence development? : a systematic review of NICE guidance.
    Longworth L; Youn J; Bojke L; Palmer S; Griffin S; Spackman E; Claxton K
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Feb; 31(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 23329429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis.
    Devlin N; Parkin D
    Health Econ; 2004 May; 13(5):437-52. PubMed ID: 15127424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE): Is economic appraisal working?
    Towse A; Pritchard C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2002; 20 Suppl 3():95-105. PubMed ID: 12457430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity analysis in economic evaluation: an audit of NICE current practice and a review of its use and value in decision-making.
    Andronis L; Barton P; Bryan S
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13(29):iii, ix-xi, 1-61. PubMed ID: 19500484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in cancer drug assessment between Spain and the United Kingdom.
    Lozano-Blázquez A; Dickson R; Fraga-Fuentes MD; Martínez-Martínez F; Calleja-Hernández MÁ
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Sep; 51(13):1843-52. PubMed ID: 26119375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Noncomparative Evidence in Health Technology Assessment Decisions.
    Griffiths EA; Macaulay R; Vadlamudi NK; Uddin J; Samuels ER
    Value Health; 2017 Dec; 20(10):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29241883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opportunity costs and local health service spending decisions: a qualitative study from Wales.
    Karlsberg Schaffer S; Sussex J; Hughes D; Devlin N
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Mar; 16():103. PubMed ID: 27012523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neuropsychotherapeutics in the UK: what has been the impact of NICE on prescribing?
    Walley T
    CNS Drugs; 2004; 18(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 14731055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective.
    Taylor R
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2001; 19 Suppl 2():33-8. PubMed ID: 11700787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing.
    Walker S; Palmer S; Sculpher M
    Br Med Bull; 2007; 81-82():51-64. PubMed ID: 17409119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals.
    Bryan S; Williams I; McIver S
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 16960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence Review Group approaches to the critical appraisal of manufacturer submissions for the NICE STA process: a mapping study and thematic analysis.
    Kaltenthaler E; Boland A; Carroll C; Dickson R; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(22):1-82, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21561569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Review of NICE Methods and Processes Across Health Technology Assessment Programmes: Why the Differences and What is the Impact?
    Cowles E; Marsden G; Cole A; Devlin N
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Aug; 15(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 28130691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Cost-Effectiveness and Other Factors on Nice Decisions.
    Dakin H; Devlin N; Feng Y; Rice N; O'Neill P; Parkin D
    Health Econ; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1256-1271. PubMed ID: 25251336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An analysis of NICE's 'restricted' (or 'optimized') decisions.
    O'Neill P; Devlin NJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(11):987-93. PubMed ID: 20936882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Economic evaluation and decision making in the UK.
    Buxton MJ
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(11):1133-42. PubMed ID: 17067197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason?
    Taylor R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 12053416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.