These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16213880)

  • 1. Measure of diagnostic accuracy for hysterography?
    Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):1059-60; author reply 1060. PubMed ID: 16213880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measure of diagnostic accuracy for hysterography?
    McDonough PG
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):1060-1. PubMed ID: 16213883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
    Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The STARD initiative: a possible link to diagnostic accuracy and reduction in medical error.
    McQueen MJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):307-8. PubMed ID: 12880531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. There is nothing staid about STARD: progress in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Johnston KC; Holloway RG
    Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):740-1. PubMed ID: 16966532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The Danish clinical guidelines (Klaringsrapporter, 1996-2001: Insufficient evidence presented for the diagnostic accuracy of recommended clinical-biochemical tests].
    Jørgensen PE; Madsen JS; Jørgensen LG; Larsen TB; Hilden J; Magid E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1667-70. PubMed ID: 15174403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Results of diagnostic accuracy studies are not always validated.
    Van den Bruel A; Aertgeerts B; Buntinx F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 59(6):559-66. PubMed ID: 16713517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of the quality of studies assessing diagnostic tests].
    Zamora J; Abraira V
    Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 2():42-5. PubMed ID: 18457564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
    de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critically appraising studies reporting assessing diagnostic tests.
    O'Connor A; Evans RB
    Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 2007 May; 37(3):487-97. PubMed ID: 17466752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnostics: new methodological initiatives].
    Magid E; Jørgensen PE; Jørgensen LG; Madsen JS; Larsen TB; Hilden J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1664-6. PubMed ID: 15174402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Using characteristic numbers to estimate the usefulness of laboratory tests for diagnosis].
    Uhari M
    Duodecim; 2004; 120(8):935-41. PubMed ID: 15185506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. QUADOMICS: an adaptation of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Assessment (QUADAS) for the evaluation of the methodological quality of studies on the diagnostic accuracy of '-omics'-based technologies.
    Lumbreras B; Porta M; Márquez S; Pollán M; Parker LA; Hernández-Aguado I
    Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1316-25. PubMed ID: 18652812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In defense of King et al: the validity of manual examination in assessing patients with neck pain.
    Bogduk N
    Spine J; 2007; 7(6):749-52; author reply 752-3. PubMed ID: 17998135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The pyrite standard: the Midas touch in the diagnosis of axial pain syndromes.
    Carragee EJ; Haldeman S; Hurwitz E
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 17197329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a diagnostic test by A. Alonzo and M. Pepe, Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18: 2987-3003.
    Hadgu A; Miller W
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11223907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using evidence-based practice to select diagnostic tests.
    Roy JS; Michlovitz S
    Hand Clin; 2009 Feb; 25(1):49-57, vi. PubMed ID: 19232915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.