BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16214250)

  • 1. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task.
    Kaiser S; Weiss O; Hill H; Markela-Lerenc J; Kiefer M; Weisbrod M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 16298004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study.
    Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the relation of movement-related potentials to the go/no-go effect on P3.
    Verleger R; Paehge T; Kolev V; Yordanova J; Jaśkowski P
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 16837117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 15653295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
    Jonkman LM
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Arousal-state modulation in children with AD/HD.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 19027356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information processing differences and similarities in adults with dyslexia and adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder during a Continuous Performance Test: a study of cortical potentials.
    Dhar M; Been PH; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3045-56. PubMed ID: 20600194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When 'go' and 'nogo' are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography.
    Lavric A; Pizzagalli DA; Forstmeier S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2483-8. PubMed ID: 15525290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anxiety, cognitive self-evaluation and performance: ERP correlates.
    Righi S; Mecacci L; Viggiano MP
    J Anxiety Disord; 2009 Dec; 23(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 19695828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurophysiological markers of alert responding during goal-directed behavior: a high-density electrical mapping study.
    Dockree PM; Kelly SP; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Sep; 27(3):587-601. PubMed ID: 16024257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological correlates of attention, inhibition, sensitivity and bias in a continuous performance task.
    Bekker EM; Kenemans JL; Verbaten MN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Sep; 115(9):2001-13. PubMed ID: 15294202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.