638 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16214435)
1. Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment and outcome of cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction.
Palmeri ST; Lowe AM; Sleeper LA; Saucedo JF; Desvigne-Nickens P; Hochman JS;
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 96(8):1042-9. PubMed ID: 16214435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interhospital transfer for early revascularization in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock--a report from the SHould we revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK? (SHOCK) trial and registry.
Jeger RV; Tseng CH; Hochman JS; Bates ER
Am Heart J; 2006 Oct; 152(4):686-92. PubMed ID: 16996836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.
Hochman JS; Sleeper LA; Webb JG; Sanborn TA; White HD; Talley JD; Buller CE; Jacobs AK; Slater JN; Col J; McKinlay SM; LeJemtel TH
N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(9):625-34. PubMed ID: 10460813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Apolito RA; Greenberg MA; Menegus MA; Lowe AM; Sleeper LA; Goldberger MH; Remick J; Radford MJ; Hochman JS
Am Heart J; 2008 Feb; 155(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 18215596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing practice patterns in the management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: elderly compared with younger patients.
Dzavík V; Burton JR; Kee C; Teo KK; Ignaszewski A; Lucas AR; Tymchak WJ
Can J Cardiol; 1998 Jul; 14(7):923-30. PubMed ID: 9706277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry.
Webb JG; Sanborn TA; Sleeper LA; Carere RG; Buller CE; Slater JN; Baran KW; Koller PT; Talley JD; Porway M; Hochman JS;
Am Heart J; 2001 Jun; 141(6):964-70. PubMed ID: 11376311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in cardiogenic shock: report from the SHOCK Study. The SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries for cardiogenic shocK?
Carnendran L; Abboud R; Sleeper LA; Gurunathan R; Webb JG; Menon V; Dzavik V; Cocke T; Hochman JS
Eur Heart J; 2001 Mar; 22(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 11237542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.
Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Dunning J; Thornley AR; Sutton AG; Muir DF; Wright RA; Hall JA; de Belder MA
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 May; 19(5):217-23. PubMed ID: 17476036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mortality after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of a mortality prediction model.
Klein LW; Shaw RE; Krone RJ; Brindis RG; Anderson HV; Block PC; McKay CR; Hewitt K; Weintraub WS;
Am J Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 96(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 15979429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial.
White HD; Assmann SF; Sanborn TA; Jacobs AK; Webb JG; Sleeper LA; Wong CK; Stewart JT; Aylward PE; Wong SC; Hochman JS
Circulation; 2005 Sep; 112(13):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 16186436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome of patients aged >or=75 years in the SHould we emergently revascularize Occluded Coronaries in cardiogenic shocK (SHOCK) trial: do elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock respond differently to emergent revascularization?
Dzavik V; Sleeper LA; Picard MH; Sanborn TA; Lowe AM; Gin K; Saucedo J; Webb JG; Menon V; Slater JN; Hochman JS;
Am Heart J; 2005 Jun; 149(6):1128-34. PubMed ID: 15976798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of late survival in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction versus left ventricular pump failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.
Brodie BR; Stuckey TD; Hansen C; Bradshaw BH; Downey WE; Pulsipher MW
Am J Cardiol; 2007 Feb; 99(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 17293178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention among elderly patients in cardiogenic shock: a multicenter, decade-long experience.
Dauerman HL; Ryan TJ; Piper WD; Kellett MA; Shubrooks SJ; Robb JF; Hearne MJ; Watkins MW; Hettleman BD; Silver MT; Niles NW; Malenka DJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2003 Jul; 15(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 12840234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of in-hospital mortality in 1333 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); Results of the primary PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).
Zeymer U; Vogt A; Zahn R; Weber MA; Tebbe U; Gottwik M; Bonzel T; Senges J; Neuhaus KL;
Eur Heart J; 2004 Feb; 25(4):322-8. PubMed ID: 14984921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
Sleeper LA; Ramanathan K; Picard MH; Lejemtel TH; White HD; Dzavik V; Tormey D; Avis NE; Hochman JS;
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Jul; 46(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16022953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrocardiographic findings in cardiogenic shock, risk prediction, and the effects of emergency revascularization: results from the SHOCK trial.
White HD; Palmeri ST; Sleeper LA; French JK; Wong CK; Lowe AM; Crapo JW; Koller PT; Baran KW; Boland JL; Hochman JS; Wagner GS;
Am Heart J; 2004 Nov; 148(5):810-7. PubMed ID: 15523311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency revascularization in patients with cardiogenic shock on admission: a report from the SHOCK trial and registry.
Jeger RV; Harkness SM; Ramanathan K; Buller CE; Pfisterer ME; Sleeper LA; Hochman JS;
Eur Heart J; 2006 Mar; 27(6):664-70. PubMed ID: 16423873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock-(S)MASH.
Urban P; Stauffer JC; Bleed D; Khatchatrian N; Amann W; Bertel O; van den Brand M; Danchin N; Kaufmann U; Meier B; Machecourt J; Pfisterer M
Eur Heart J; 1999 Jul; 20(14):1030-8. PubMed ID: 10383377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and delayed revascularization for myocardial infarction and shock in the absence of primary angioplasty: a treatment strategy with or without thrombolysis?
Drakos SG; Anastasiou-Nana MI; Terrovitis JV; Tsagalou EP; Kanakakis J; Ntalianis A; Lazaris N; Maroulidis G; Venetsanakos J; Bonios M; Nanas JN
Coron Artery Dis; 2008 Nov; 19(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 18923249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Left ventricular assist device implantation after acute anterior wall myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: a two-center study.
Dang NC; Topkara VK; Leacche M; John R; Byrne JG; Naka Y
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 130(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 16153915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
