These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16214496)

  • 1. Passive motion characteristics of the talocrural and the subtalar joint by dual Euler angles.
    Wong Y; Kim W; Ying N
    J Biomech; 2005 Dec; 38(12):2480-5. PubMed ID: 16214496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of passive motion characteristics of the ankle joint complex using dual Euler angle parameters.
    Ying N; Kim W; Wong Y; Kam BH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2004 Feb; 19(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 14967578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Six DOF in vivo kinematics of the ankle joint complex: Application of a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
    de Asla RJ; Wan L; Rubash HE; Li G
    J Orthop Res; 2006 May; 24(5):1019-27. PubMed ID: 16609963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro assessment of a motion-based optimization method for locating the talocrural and subtalar joint axes.
    Lewis GS; Sommer HJ; Piazza SJ
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):596-603. PubMed ID: 16813451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of subtalar joint axis location by restriction of talocrural joint motion.
    Lewis GS; Kirby KA; Piazza SJ
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jan; 25(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 16472526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Determining dual Euler angles of the ankle complex in vivo using "flock of birds" electromagnetic tracking device.
    Ying N; Kim W
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Feb; 127(1):98-107. PubMed ID: 15868792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of modified Broström and Evans procedures in simulated lateral ankle injury.
    Fujii T; Kitaoka HB; Watanabe K; Luo ZP; An KN
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2006 Jun; 38(6):1025-31. PubMed ID: 16775540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subject-specific axes of the ankle joint complex.
    Leitch J; Stebbins J; Zavatsky AB
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2923-8. PubMed ID: 20727524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/talocrural joint during running support.
    Engsberg JR; Andrews JG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1987 Jun; 19(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 3600242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of lateral ligament sectioning on the stability of the ankle and subtalar joint.
    Ringleb SI; Dhakal A; Anderson CD; Bawab S; Paranjape R
    J Orthop Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1459-64. PubMed ID: 21445995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of subtalar joint motion during anticipated medial cutting turns and level walking using a multi-segment foot model.
    Jenkyn TR; Shultz R; Giffin JR; Birmingham TB
    Gait Posture; 2010 Feb; 31(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 19897368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of dual Euler angles to quantify the three-dimensional joint motion and its application to the ankle joint complex.
    Ying N; Kim W
    J Biomech; 2002 Dec; 35(12):1647-57. PubMed ID: 12445618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting talocalcaneal joint orientations from talocalcaneal/talocrural joint orientations.
    Engsberg JR; Grimston SK; Wackwitz JH
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 3404332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical stability of the subtalar joint after lateral ligament sectioning and ankle brace application: a biomechanical experimental study.
    Kamiya T; Kura H; Suzuki D; Uchiyama E; Fujimiya M; Yamashita T
    Am J Sports Med; 2009 Dec; 37(12):2451-8. PubMed ID: 19654428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints--Part I: Kinematics.
    Siegler S; Chen J; Schneck CD
    J Biomech Eng; 1988 Nov; 110(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 3205022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact areas of the tibiotalar joint.
    Windisch G; Odehnal B; Reimann R; Anderhuber F; Stachel H
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1481-7. PubMed ID: 17576623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach.
    van den Bogert AJ; Smith GD; Nigg BM
    J Biomech; 1994 Dec; 27(12):1477-88. PubMed ID: 7806555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo three-dimensional analysis of hindfoot kinematics.
    Imai K; Tokunaga D; Takatori R; Ikoma K; Maki M; Ohkawa H; Ogura A; Tsuji Y; Inoue N; Kubo T
    Foot Ankle Int; 2009 Nov; 30(11):1094-100. PubMed ID: 19912721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational modeling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg with simulation of two cadaver studies.
    Liacouras PC; Wayne JS
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):811-17. PubMed ID: 18067384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of consistent patterns of range of motion in the ankle joint with a computed tomography stress-test.
    Tuijthof GJ; Zengerink M; Beimers L; Jonges R; Maas M; van Dijk CN; Blankevoort L
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Jul; 24(6):517-23. PubMed ID: 19356831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.