These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16215746)

  • 1. Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Rumiati RI
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):448-58. PubMed ID: 16215746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 16151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):468-83. PubMed ID: 16215745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Bherer L
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1262-82. PubMed ID: 18927042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.
    Miller J
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: abstract spatial coding in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Joucoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A neuropsychological assessment of dual-task costs in closed-head injury patients using Cohen's effect size estimation method.
    Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Pashler H
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):553-61. PubMed ID: 16142490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 8189196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.
    De Jong R
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 7754082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planning keypress and reaching responses: effects of response location and number of potential effectors.
    Adam JJ; Taminiau B; van Veen N; Ament B; Rijcken JM; Meijer K; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1464-78. PubMed ID: 19045986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.