These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16216029)

  • 1. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer.
    Raab SS; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ; Jensen DC; Geisinger KR; Booth CN; Krishnamurti U; Stone CH; Janosky JE; Grzybicki DM
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jun; 24(18):2808-14. PubMed ID: 16782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
    Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytohistologic discrepancies: a means to improve pathology practice and patient outcomes.
    Clary KM; Silverman JF; Liu Y; Sturgis CD; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 11939731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
    Novis DA
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
    Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality in cancer diagnosis.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2010; 60(3):139-65. PubMed ID: 20444999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
    Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic discrepancy: searching for quality assurance methods that work.
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 17074691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomic pathology databases and patient safety.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Geyer SJ; Jensen C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Oct; 129(10):1246-51. PubMed ID: 16196512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure!
    Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of latent factors contributing to error: addressing surgical pathology error wisely.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22032570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.