BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16216029)

  • 1. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "Big Dog" effect: variability assessing the causes of error in diagnoses of patients with lung cancer.
    Raab SS; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ; Jensen DC; Geisinger KR; Booth CN; Krishnamurti U; Stone CH; Janosky JE; Grzybicki DM
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jun; 24(18):2808-14. PubMed ID: 16782918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Raab SS
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):849-63. PubMed ID: 15555746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a new method in reaching consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic correlation discrepancy.
    Raab SS; Stone CH; Wojcik EM; Geisinger KR; Dahmoush L; Garcia FU; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Zarbo RJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 17074685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytohistologic discrepancies: a means to improve pathology practice and patient outcomes.
    Clary KM; Silverman JF; Liu Y; Sturgis CD; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 11939731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of workload with disagreement and amendment rates in surgical pathology and nongynecologic cytology.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):820-2. PubMed ID: 16690479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Database construction for improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.
    Grzybicki DM; Turcsanyi B; Becich MJ; Gupta D; Gilbertson JR; Raab SS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Oct; 124(4):500-9. PubMed ID: 16146808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Valenstein PN; Sirota RL
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):979-96, vii. PubMed ID: 15555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs.
    Novis DA
    Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
    Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality in cancer diagnosis.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    CA Cancer J Clin; 2010; 60(3):139-65. PubMed ID: 20444999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement and error rates using blinded review to evaluate surgical pathology of biopsy material.
    Renshaw AA; Cartagena N; Granter SR; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jun; 119(6):797-800. PubMed ID: 12817425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving consensus on the cause of cytologic-histologic discrepancy: searching for quality assurance methods that work.
    Renshaw AA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Dec; 126(6):831-2. PubMed ID: 17074691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomic pathology databases and patient safety.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Geyer SJ; Jensen C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Oct; 129(10):1246-51. PubMed ID: 16196512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomic pathology and patient safety: it's not an error: it's a diagnostic misadventure!
    Grzybicki DM; Raab SS; Janosky JE; Vrbin-Turcsanyi C; Bruno S; Zarbo RJ; Stone CH; Meier FA; Geisinger KR; Gavin AJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jan; 129(1):167-8; author reply 169. PubMed ID: 18183670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of latent factors contributing to error: addressing surgical pathology error wisely.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22032570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.