346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16216371)
1. Laboratory scale Clean-In-Place (CIP) studies on the effectiveness of different caustic and acid wash steps on the removal of dairy biofilms.
Bremer PJ; Fillery S; McQuillan AJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 106(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 16216371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antimicrobial activity and effectiveness of a combination of sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide in killing and removing Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms from surfaces.
DeQueiroz GA; Day DF
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Oct; 103(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 17897181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of a laboratory scale clean-in-place system to test the effectiveness of "natural" antimicrobials against dairy biofilms.
Dufour M; Simmonds RS; Bremer PJ
J Food Prot; 2004 Jul; 67(7):1438-43. PubMed ID: 15270498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disinfectant test against monoculture and mixed-culture biofilms composed of technological, spoilage and pathogenic bacteria: bactericidal effect of essential oil and hydrosol of Satureja thymbra and comparison with standard acid-base sanitizers.
Chorianopoulos NG; Giaouris ED; Skandamis PN; Haroutounian SA; Nychas GJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 104(6):1586-96. PubMed ID: 18217930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model system for evaluating surface disinfection in dairy factory environments.
Knight GC; Craven HM
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 137(2-3):161-7. PubMed ID: 20022125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Persistence strategies of Bacillus cereus spores isolated from dairy silo tanks.
Shaheen R; Svensson B; Andersson MA; Christiansson A; Salkinoja-Salonen M
Food Microbiol; 2010 May; 27(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 20227599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival, biofilm formation and acid tolerance under simulated slaughter plant moist and dry conditions.
Skandamis PN; Stopforth JD; Ashton LV; Geornaras I; Kendall PA; Sofos JN
Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 19028314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial dairy farms.
Gibson H; Sinclair LA; Brizuela CM; Worton HL; Protheroe RG
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 46(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 18179447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the effect of cleaning regimes on biofilms of thermophilic bacilli on stainless steel.
Parkar SG; Flint SH; Brooks JD
J Appl Microbiol; 2004; 96(1):110-6. PubMed ID: 14678164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the potential suitability of selected commercially available enzymes for cleaning-in-place (CIP) in the dairy industry.
Boyce A; Piterina AV; Walsh G
Biofouling; 2010 Oct; 26(7):837-50. PubMed ID: 20931416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a new regeneration process by adsorption-coagulation and flocculation on the physicochemical properties and the detergent efficiency of regenerated cleaning solutions.
Blel W; Dif M; Sire O
J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 155():1-10. PubMed ID: 25770957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of bacterial strains isolated from a beef-processing plant following cleaning and disinfection - Influence of isolated strains on biofilm formation by Sakaï and EDL 933 E. coli O157:H7.
Marouani-Gadri N; Augier G; Carpentier B
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Jul; 133(1-2):62-7. PubMed ID: 19446903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of ozonation and chlorination for the disinfection of stainless steel surfaces.
Greene AK; Few BK; Serafini JC
J Dairy Sci; 1993 Nov; 76(11):3617-20. PubMed ID: 8270705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of fungal proteases potentially suitable for environmentally friendly cleaning-in-place in the dairy industry.
Boyce A; Walsh G
Chemosphere; 2012 Jun; 88(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 22464862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of biofilms by chemical disinfectants and mechanical cleaning.
Exner M; Tuschewitzki GJ; Scharnagel J
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1987 Apr; 183(5-6):549-63. PubMed ID: 3109156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bacterial decontamination of DUWL biofilm using Oxygenal 6.
Szymańska J
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2006; 13(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 16841887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation and remediation of bulk soap dispensers for biofilm.
Lorenz LA; Ramsay BD; Goeres DM; Fields MW; Zapka CA; Macinga DR
Biofouling; 2012; 28(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 22257312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term effects of disinfectants on the community composition of drinking water biofilms.
Roeder RS; Lenz J; Tarne P; Gebel J; Exner M; Szewzyk U
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2010 Jun; 213(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 20494617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of pipe materials and VBNC cells on culturable bacteria in a chlorinated drinking water model system.
Lee DG; Park SJ; Kim SJ
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):1558-62. PubMed ID: 18062238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interactions in dual species biofilms between Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e and several strains of Staphylococcus aureus.
Rieu A; Lemaître JP; Guzzo J; Piveteau P
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 126(1-2):76-82. PubMed ID: 18554739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
