These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16217120)

  • 1. Responsivity issues in the treatment of sexual offenders.
    Looman J; Dickie I; Abracen J
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2005 Oct; 6(4):330-53. PubMed ID: 16217120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of treatment attrition as indicators for program improvement not offender shortcomings: a study of sex offender treatment attrition.
    Beyko MJ; Wong SC
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Oct; 17(4):375-89. PubMed ID: 16341600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing risk mitigation in management of sexual offenders: a structural model.
    Lamade R; Gabriel A; Prentky R
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 21565406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A descriptive model of the offense process for female sexual offenders.
    Gannon TA; Rose MR; Ward T
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Sep; 20(3):352-74. PubMed ID: 18775843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juvenile sex offenders: a complex population.
    Andrade JT; Vincent GM; Saleh FM
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):163-7. PubMed ID: 16423244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of sex offenders: lessons learned from the assessment of non-sex offenders.
    Serin RC; Mailloux DL
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2003 Jun; 989():185-97; discussion 236-46. PubMed ID: 12839898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of sexual offenders with psychopathic traits: recent research developments and clinical implications.
    Abracen J; Looman J; Langton CM
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2008 Jul; 9(3):144-66. PubMed ID: 18495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-, three-, and four-factor PCL-R models in applied sex offender risk assessments.
    Weaver CM; Meyer RG; Van Nort JJ; Tristan L
    Assessment; 2006 Jun; 13(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 16672735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Ward and Hudson pathways model of the sexual offense process applied to offenders with intellectual disability.
    Lindsay WR; Steptoe L; Beech AT
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):379-92. PubMed ID: 18941166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington State.
    Jackson RL; Richards HJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 17478861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing sexual offender treatment efficacy: mainstream sexual offenders and sexual offenders with special needs.
    Keeling JA; Rose JL; Beech AR
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2007 Jun; 32(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 17613682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of sex offender treatment for psychopathic sexual offenders.
    Doren DM; Yates PM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Apr; 52(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 17615428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of sex offenders about treatment: satisfaction and engagement in group therapy.
    Levenson JS; Macgowan MJ; Morin JW; Cotter LP
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Mar; 21(1):35-56. PubMed ID: 18948429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Critique to the medical-social management of dangerous mental patients and sexual aggressors in France].
    Bénézech M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2002; 186(1):103-12; discussion 113-5. PubMed ID: 12146135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developments in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: looking backward with a view to the future.
    Abracen J; Looman J
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Jan; 20(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 15618555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making sense, making good, or making meaning? Cognitive distortions as targets of change in offender treatment.
    Friestad C
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 May; 56(3):465-82. PubMed ID: 21422010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program.
    Olver ME; Wong SC; Nicholaichuk TP
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Mar; 24(3):522-36. PubMed ID: 18458350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual offender treatment: a positive approach.
    Marshall WL; Marshall LE; Serran GA; O'Brien MD
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 31(4):681-96. PubMed ID: 18996307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working positively with sexual offenders: maximizing the effectiveness of treatment.
    Marshall WL; Ward T; Mann RE; Moulden H; Fernandez YM; Serran G; Marshall LE
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1096-114. PubMed ID: 16051729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The self-regulation model of sexual offending: Relationship to risk and need.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 22667811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.