These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16217225)

  • 21. Groups publish performance measures aimed at boosting cardiac rehab referrals.
    Mitka M
    JAMA; 2007 Nov; 298(18):2126-8. PubMed ID: 18000191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Method of the assessment of patients outcome in cardiac rehabilitation by means of quality indicators--a description of the method].
    Röhrig B; Nosper M; Linck-Eleftheriadis S; Strandt G; Salzwedel A; Völler H
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2014 Feb; 53(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24217887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can clinical practice guidelines increase the cost-effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation? Small Work Group minority report.
    Johnston MV
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6 Suppl):JS87-9. PubMed ID: 9191718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Heartbeat: Cardiac rehabilitation in low-resource settings.
    Otto CM
    Heart; 2016 Sep; 102(18):1421-2. PubMed ID: 27559079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Costs after hip fracture in independently living patients: a randomised comparison of three rehabilitation modalities.
    Lahtinen A; Leppilahti J; Vähänikkilä H; Harmainen S; Koistinen P; Rissanen P; Jalovaara P
    Clin Rehabil; 2017 May; 31(5):672-685. PubMed ID: 27343197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiac rehabilitation services: what are they and are they worth it?
    Oldridge NB
    Compr Ther; 1991 May; 17(5):59-66. PubMed ID: 1908757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Standards and guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation. Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation of the European Society for Cardiology].
    Ceci V; Chieffo C; Giannuzzi P; Boncompagni F; Jesi P; Schweiger C; Assennato P; Griffo R; Scrutinio D
    Cardiologia; 1999 Jun; 44(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 10443056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The costs and benefits of technology-enabled, home-based cardiac rehabilitation measured in a randomised controlled trial.
    Whittaker F; Wade V
    J Telemed Telecare; 2014 Oct; 20(7):419-22. PubMed ID: 25400004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Show me the impact.
    Olsen GG; Lynch KV
    Rehab Manag; 2005 Apr; 18(3):40-2. PubMed ID: 15819278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac rehabilitation and getting to lipid goals.
    Wilson PW
    J Cardiopulm Rehabil; 2005; 25(5):264-5. PubMed ID: 16217228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Drug addict rehabilitation: a burden on society?
    Berg JE; Andersen S
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1992; 15(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1336768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. CMS proposed payment.
    Murer CG
    Rehab Manag; 2006 Mar; 19(2):58-61. PubMed ID: 16538964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can clinical practice increase the cost-effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation? Small Work Group majority report.
    Laouri M
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6 Suppl):JS84-6. PubMed ID: 9191717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A review of the economic evaluation of interventions for cardiovascular diseases in Spain.
    Catalá-López F; García-Altés A; Alvarez-Martín E; Gènova-Maleras R; Morant-Ginestar C; Fernández de Larrea-Baz N
    Farm Hosp; 2012; 36(3):163-5. PubMed ID: 22024013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cardiac rehabilitation.
    Dinnes J; Kleijnen J; Leitner M; Thompson D
    Qual Health Care; 1999 Mar; 8(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 10557673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How PPS refinements influenced the delivery of rehabilitation services in home care.
    Krafft C
    Home Healthc Nurse; 2009 Jun; 27(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 19509526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Can clinical practice guidelines increase the cost-effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation?
    Stason WB
    Med Care; 1997 Jun; 35(6 Suppl):JS68-77; discussion JS78-83. PubMed ID: 9191716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial.
    Reid RD; Dafoe WA; Morrin L; Mayhew A; Papadakis S; Beaton L; Oldridge NB; Coyle D; Wells GA
    Am Heart J; 2005 May; 149(5):862-8. PubMed ID: 15894969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation: a cost assessment based on a randomized clinical trial.
    Kruse M; Hochstrasser S; Zwisler AD; Kjellberg J
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 16984681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation].
    Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2005 May; 84(5):431-40. PubMed ID: 15917979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.