420 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16217470)
1. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
Truong PT; Lee JC; Soer B; Gaul CA; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
Kantor J
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients.
Sun J; Mu D; Liu C; Ji K; Chen L; Liu W; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient-related keloid scar assessment and outcome measures.
Nicholas RS; Falvey H; Lemonas P; Damodaran G; Ghannem A; Selim F; Navsaria H; Myers S
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Mar; 129(3):648-656. PubMed ID: 22373972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trocar port scar quality in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery.
de Vries CEE; Dekker AC; van Veen RN; van der Zeeuw FT; Coblijn UK; Brölmann FE; van Wagensveld BA
Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2018 May; 14(5):616-622. PubMed ID: 29610013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars.
Durani P; McGrouther DA; Ferguson MW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1481-1489. PubMed ID: 19407619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring reliability of scar rating scales using photographs of burns from children aged up to 15 years.
Simons M; Ziviani J; Thorley M; McNee J; Tyack Z
J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 23271058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.
Chae JK; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Park K
Ann Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):615-623. PubMed ID: 27746642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
Simons M; Tyack Z
J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients with leukemia.
Biçici B; Güneş UY
J Clin Nurs; 2012 Dec; 21(23-24):3328-34. PubMed ID: 22686194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.
Liu X; Nelemans PJ; Van Winden M; Kelleners-Smeets NW; Mosterd K
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):341-346. PubMed ID: 27439316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.
Chung JH; Kwon SH; Kim KJ; Lee JM; Yoon JM; Cheon JH; Yoon ES; Park SH
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 33979825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Observation on the clinical application effects of skin distractor on the treatment of scars].
Gui WL; Yang E; Zhang HS
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Mar; 33(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28316162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
