451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16217663)
1. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.
Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Wilson DC; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):913-22. PubMed ID: 16217663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint contact forces: an in vitro investigation.
Niosi CA; Wilson DC; Zhu Q; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18165744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new total posterior-element replacement system.
Wilke HJ; Schmidt H; Werner K; Schmölz W; Drumm J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2790-6; discussion 2797. PubMed ID: 17108830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous device and a rigid stabilization on lumbar adjacent segment range of motion.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Kuhn S; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):404-9. PubMed ID: 22094153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.
Zhu Q; Itshayek E; Jones CF; Schwab T; Larson CR; Lenke LG; Cripton PA
Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S599-611. PubMed ID: 22531900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of facetectomy and crosslink augmentation on motion segment flexibility in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Chutkan NB; Zhou H; Akins JP; Wenger KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E828-35. PubMed ID: 18923306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
Hartmann F; Dietz SO; Hely H; Rommens PM; Gercek E
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of a novel posterior construct in a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion model an in vitro study.
Sethi A; Muzumdar AM; Ingalhalikar A; Vaidya R
Spine J; 2011 Sep; 11(9):863-9. PubMed ID: 21802998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression.
Schulte TL; Hurschler C; Haversath M; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V; Filler TJ; Osada N; Fallenberg EM; Hackenberg L
Eur Spine J; 2008 Aug; 17(8):1057-65. PubMed ID: 18493802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.
Gédet P; Haschtmann D; Thistlethwaite PA; Ferguson SJ
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 19565278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
