These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16218020)

  • 21. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study.
    Funama Y; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Kakei K; Nagasue N; Shimamura M; Sato N; Sultana S; Morishita S; Yamashita Y
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):905-10. PubMed ID: 16237139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
    Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
    Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of acquisition parameters on dose and image quality optimisation in paediatric pelvis radiography-A phantom study.
    Mohammed Ali A; Hogg P; Abuzaid M; England A
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():130-137. PubMed ID: 31439232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimizing the Exposure Indicator as a Dose Management Strategy in Computed Radiography.
    Seeram E; Davidson R; Bushong S; Swan H
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(4):380-91. PubMed ID: 26952062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Papadimitriou D
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):836-40. PubMed ID: 11560832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the performance of digital x-ray systems in pelvis radiography.
    Jreije A; Krynke L; Gricienė B; Rimkus B; Dementavičienė J; Skovorodko K
    J Radiol Prot; 2024 Jul; 44(3):. PubMed ID: 38950524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry.
    Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC
    Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monte Carlo calculation of radiation dose in CT examinations using phantom and patient tomographic models.
    Salvadó M; López M; Morant JJ; Calzado A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):364-8. PubMed ID: 15933138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The reduction of the radiation dosage by means of storage phosphor-film radiography compared to a conventional film-screen system with a grid cassette on a skull phantom].
    Heyne JP; Merbold H; Sehner J; Neumann R; Freesmeyer M; Jonetz-Mentzel L; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10464506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
    England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study of adult patient doses in film screen and computed radiography in some Sudanese hospitals.
    Elshiekh E; Suliman II; Habbani F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):402-5. PubMed ID: 25889604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing the standard knee X-ray exposure factor, 10 kV rule, and modified 10 kV rule techniques in digital radiography to reduce patient radiation dose without loss of image quality.
    Wenman A; Lockwood P
    Radiography (Lond); 2024 Mar; 30(2):574-581. PubMed ID: 38295494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager.
    Deschênes S; Charron G; Beaudoin G; Labelle H; Dubois J; Miron MC; Parent S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(9):989-94. PubMed ID: 20228703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Antero-posterior (AP) pelvis x-ray imaging on a trolley: Impact of trolley design, mattress design and radiographer practice on image quality and radiation dose.
    Tugwell JR; England A; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 28687293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
    Mori T; Muto H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Varied tube potential with constant effective dose at lumbar spine radiography using a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H; Persliden J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):240-5. PubMed ID: 15933115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.