These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1621883)

  • 1. Automatization and training in visual search.
    Czerwinski M; Lightfoot N; Shiffrin RM
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):271-315. PubMed ID: 1621883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does training under consistent mapping conditions lead to automatic attention attraction to targets in search tasks?
    Lefebvre C; Cousineau D; Larochelle S
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1401-15. PubMed ID: 19064486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18952202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automaticity and preattentive processing.
    Treisman A; Vieira A; Hayes A
    Am J Psychol; 1992; 105(2):341-62. PubMed ID: 1621885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When is search for a static target among dynamic distractors efficient?
    Pinto Y; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16478326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Training and transfer of training in the search for camouflaged targets.
    Boot WR; Neider MB; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):950-63. PubMed ID: 19429971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: a comparison between handwriting and typing.
    Longcamp M; Boucard C; Gilhodes JC; Velay JL
    Hum Mov Sci; 2006 Oct; 25(4-5):646-56. PubMed ID: 17011660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity.
    Menneer T; Cave KR; Donnelly N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):125-39. PubMed ID: 19586251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search.
    Ásgeirsson ÁG; Kristjánsson Á
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jul; 73(5):1350-60. PubMed ID: 21491164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects.
    Blough DS
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1989 Jan; 15(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 2926332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.
    Yang H; Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 19304646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging, memory and visual search.
    Kramer AF; Boot WR; McCarley JS; Peterson MS; Colcombe A; Scialfa CT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):288-304. PubMed ID: 16438921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field.
    Shoji H; Skrandies W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 16356572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Demands on attention and the role of response priming in visual discrimination of feature conjunctions.
    Fournier LR; Herbert RJ; Farris C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):836-52. PubMed ID: 15462624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Element and compound matching-to-sample performance in pigeons: the roles of information load and training history.
    Brown MF; Morrison SK
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Apr; 16(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 2335772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Levels-of-processing effects in infant memory?
    Adler SA; Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    Child Dev; 1998 Apr; 69(2):280-94. PubMed ID: 9586205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of visual search in infants and very young children.
    Gerhardstein P; Rovee-Collier C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Feb; 81(2):194-215. PubMed ID: 11786009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Revisiting the category effect: the influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search.
    Smilek D; Dixon MJ; Merikle PM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 16510131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.