These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16219993)

  • 21. Music perception in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of findings between HiRes90 and HiRes120.
    Filipo R; Ballantyne D; Mancini P; D'elia C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):378-81. PubMed ID: 18368569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test.
    Kang R; Nimmons GL; Drennan W; Longnion J; Ruffin C; Nie K; Won JH; Worman T; Yueh B; Rubinstein J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 19474735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners.
    Jung KH; Cho YS; Cho JK; Park GY; Kim EY; Hong SH; Chung WH; Won JH; Rubinstein JT
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Melody identification for cochlear implant users and normal hearers using expanded pitch contours.
    Digeser FM; Hast A; Wesarg T; Hessel H; Hoppe U
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 269(11):2317-26. PubMed ID: 22193870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved perception of music with a harmonic based algorithm for cochlear implants.
    Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jul; 21(4):684-94. PubMed ID: 23613083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test.
    Swanson B; Dawson P; McDermott H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2009; 10 Suppl 1():100-4. PubMed ID: 19148894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.
    Geurts L; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):713-26. PubMed ID: 11248975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 18465410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a Test Battery to Assess Perception of Music in Children With Cochlear Implants.
    Roy AT; Scattergood-Keepper L; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Butler C; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 140(6):540-7. PubMed ID: 24722833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Olszewski C; Rychener M; Sena K; Knutson JF; Witt S; Macpherson B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15937406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. From TEMPO+ to OPUS 2: what can music tests tell us about processor upgrades?
    van Besouw RM; Grasmeder ML
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S40-3. PubMed ID: 21917218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
    Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Musical pitch discrimination by cochlear implant users.
    Ping L; Yuan M; Feng H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 May; 121(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22724279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Innes-Brown H; Marozeau JP; Storey CM; Blamey PJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):789-806. PubMed ID: 24224987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effects of musical and linguistic components in recognition of real-world musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.
    Gfeller K; Jiang D; Oleson JJ; Driscoll V; Olszewski C; Knutson JF; Turner C; Gantz B
    J Music Ther; 2012; 49(1):68-101. PubMed ID: 22803258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental assessment of polyphonic tones with cochlear implants.
    Penninger RT; Limb CJ; Vermeire K; Leman M; Dhooge I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Sep; 34(7):1267-71. PubMed ID: 23921943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2298-310. PubMed ID: 15532661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.