These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

337 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16220490)

  • 81. Assessing covariate balance when using the generalized propensity score with quantitative or continuous exposures.
    Austin PC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1365-1377. PubMed ID: 29415624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M; Rigon MR; Caruana E; Mebazaa A; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1938-1954. PubMed ID: 24201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.
    Elze MC; Gregson J; Baber U; Williamson E; Sartori S; Mehran R; Nichols M; Stone GW; Pocock SJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 28104076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(25):3083-107. PubMed ID: 19757444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Propensity scores with misclassified treatment assignment: a likelihood-based adjustment.
    Braun D; Gorfine M; Parmigiani G; Arvold ND; Dominici F; Zigler C
    Biostatistics; 2017 Oct; 18(4):695-710. PubMed ID: 28419189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Propensity-score matching in economic analyses: comparison with regression models, instrumental variables, residual inclusion, differences-in-differences, and decomposition methods.
    Crown WH
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2014 Feb; 12(1):7-18. PubMed ID: 24399360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.
    D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2265-81. PubMed ID: 9802183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Comparing the high-dimensional propensity score for use with administrative data with propensity scores derived from high-quality clinical data.
    Austin PC; Wu CF; Lee DS; Tu JV
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Feb; 29(2):568-588. PubMed ID: 30975044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Graphic report of the results from propensity score method analyses.
    Shrier I; Pang M; Platt RW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():154-159. PubMed ID: 28603009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. A systematic review of propensity score methods in the acute care surgery literature: avoiding the pitfalls and proposing a set of reporting guidelines.
    Zakrison TL; Austin PC; McCredie VA
    Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(3):385-395. PubMed ID: 28342097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Comparing Propensity Score Methods Versus Traditional Regression Analysis for the Evaluation of Observational Data: A Case Study Evaluating the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.
    Amoah J; Stuart EA; Cosgrove SE; Harris AD; Han JH; Lautenbach E; Tamma PD
    Clin Infect Dis; 2020 Dec; 71(9):e497-e505. PubMed ID: 32069360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. A Review of Propensity-Score Methods and Their Use in Cardiovascular Research.
    Deb S; Austin PC; Tu JV; Ko DT; Mazer CD; Kiss A; Fremes SE
    Can J Cardiol; 2016 Feb; 32(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 26315351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Primer on statistical interpretation or methods report card on propensity-score matching in the cardiology literature from 2004 to 2006: a systematic review.
    Austin PC
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2008 Sep; 1(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 20031790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Propensity Score Methods in Studies Investigating the Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Therapy.
    Eikenboom AM; Le Cessie S; Waernbaum I; Groenwold RHH; de Boer MGJ
    Open Forum Infect Dis; 2022 Apr; 9(4):ofac110. PubMed ID: 35355895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Optimally combining propensity score subclasses.
    Rudolph KE; Colson KE; Stuart EA; Ahern J
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(27):4937-4947. PubMed ID: 27426623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Abstract: An International Comparison of Private and Public Schools Using Multilevel Propensity Score Methods and Graphics.
    Bryer JM; Pruzek RM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 Nov; 46(6):1010-1. PubMed ID: 26736126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Quantile Stratification Based on a Misspecified Propensity Score in Longitudinal Treatment Effectiveness Analyses of Ordinal Doses.
    Leon AC; Hedeker D
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2007 Aug; 51(12):6114-6122. PubMed ID: 18037978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Propensity score methods.
    Rubin DB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 20103037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. A brief guide to propensity score analysis.
    Ebrahim Valojerdi A; Janani L
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2018; 32():122. PubMed ID: 30815417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data.
    Xie Y; Brand JE; Jann B
    Sociol Methodol; 2012 Aug; 42(1):314-347. PubMed ID: 23482633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.