193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16220627)
1. Medical research, risk, and bystanders.
Kimmelman J
IRB; 2005; 27(4):1-6. PubMed ID: 16220627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ten questions institutional review boards should ask when reviewing international clinical research protocols.
Fitzgerald DW; Wasunna A; Pape JW
IRB; 2003; 25(2):14-8. PubMed ID: 12833903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical considerations for research in critically ill patients.
Bigatello LM; George E; Hurford WE
Crit Care Med; 2003 Mar; 31(3 Suppl):S178-81. PubMed ID: 12626965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing benefits in clinical research: why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky.
Churchill LR; Nelson DK; Henderson GE; King NM; Davis AM; Leahey E; Wilfond BS
IRB; 2003; 25(3):1-8. PubMed ID: 14569987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Caregivers as subjects of clinical drug trials: a review of human subjects protection practices in published studies of Alzheimer's disease pharmacotherapies.
Lingler JH; Parker LS; DeKosky ST; Schulz R
IRB; 2006; 28(3):11-8. PubMed ID: 17036439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The conduct of Canadian researchers and institutional review boards regarding substituted consent for research.
Bravo G; Dubois MF; Paquet M
IRB; 2004; 26(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15281211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research in neonatology: improved ratio of risk to benefit through a scientifically based alteration in research design.
Blackburn MG; Pleasure JR; Sorenson JH
Clin Res; 1976 Dec; 24(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 11661368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethical genetic research on human subjects.
Harris J
Jurimetrics; 1999; 40():77-91. PubMed ID: 16285118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Third-party risks in research: should IRBs address them?
Hausman DM
IRB; 2007; 29(3):1-5. PubMed ID: 17847635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: are we really ready to fix a broken system?
Beh HG
Law Psychol Rev; 2002; 26(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 16514756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protection of research subjects.
Berger JT
N Engl J Med; 2003 Jul; 349(2):188-92; author reply 188-92. PubMed ID: 12856647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Research and patients in a permanent vegetative state.
Draper H
J Med Ethics; 2006 Oct; 32(10):607; discussion 609-11. PubMed ID: 17012506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Crossing the line? Medical research on brain-dead people raises ethical questions.
Guterman L
Chron High Educ; 2003 Aug; 49(47):A13-5. PubMed ID: 15287131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research on cognitively impaired adults.
Silverman H
Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(3):4; author reply 4. PubMed ID: 15281718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Clinical trials in developing countries: who should define ethics?].
Béréterbide F; Hirsch F
Bull Soc Pathol Exot; 2008 Apr; 101(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 18543701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
Moore DL
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethical challenges in research: another look.
Bird SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Sep; 8(9):15-7. PubMed ID: 18853373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence-based practice of research ethics review?
Beagan B; McDonald M
Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):62-8. PubMed ID: 16459416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. When to seek ethical review for a study.
McCluskey A
Aust Occup Ther J; 2009 Dec; 56(6):371. PubMed ID: 20854547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fair benefits in international medical research.
Arras JD
Hastings Cent Rep; 2004; 34(3):3. PubMed ID: 15281717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
