These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

625 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16220803)

  • 1. Marginal fit of titanium metal-ceramic crowns.
    Jesús Suárez M; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):390-1. PubMed ID: 16220803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.
    Albert FE; El-Mowafy OM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 15543909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of CAD/CAM systems and cement selection on marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic crowns.
    Martínez-Rus F; Suárez MJ; Rivera B; Pradíes G
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr; 25(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 22779278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
    Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal fit of cemented and screw-retained crowns incorporated on the Straumann (ITI) Dental Implant System: an in vitro study.
    Tosches NA; Brägger U; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 19126111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature.
    Tao J; Yoda M; Kimura K; Okuno O
    Dent Mater; 2006 May; 22(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 16038971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal fit of restorations before and after cementation in vivo.
    Kern M; Schaller HG; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 8148031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of electric arc, gas oxygen torch and induction melting techniques on the marginal accuracy of cast base-metal and noble metal-ceramic crowns.
    Gómez-Cogolludo P; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):826-31. PubMed ID: 23810734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An intraindividual clinical comparison of two metal-ceramic systems: a 5-year prospective study.
    Marklund S; Bergman B; Hedlund SO; Nilson H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 12675459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY; Adib SM; Zebouni EA; Bechara BB; Rifai KT
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical discrepancies and closeness of marginal fit of full cast crowns in correlation with the luting agent used].
    Utz KH; Grüner M; Vothknecht R
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Nov; 44(11):901-4. PubMed ID: 2639008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of porcelain-firing cycles and surface finishing on the marginal discrepancy of titanium copings.
    Naveen HC; Pillai LK; Porwal A; Nadiger RK; Guttal SS
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Feb; 20(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 21261776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal accuracy of titanium copings fabricated by casting and CAD/CAM techniques.
    Witkowski S; Komine F; Gerds T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16872930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.