125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16223025)
1. In vitro evaluation of the XR-15 portable x-ray unit for forensic odontology.
Varghese S; Kimmel A; Radmer T; Bradley TG; Bahcall J
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2004 Jun; 22(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16223025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the quality of dental images depend on patient's age and sex ?- Explanations from the forensic sciences.
Gelbrich B; Gelbrich G; Lessig R
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 22717952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra-oral storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the assessment of alveolar bone structures.
Kaeppler G; Vogel A; Axmann-Krcmar D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Nov; 29(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 11114666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Television radiographic evaluation of periapical osseous radiolucencies.
Kasle MJ; Klein AI
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1976 Jun; 41(6):789-96. PubMed ID: 1063984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiography of the periapical region as a diagnostic aid. II. Diagnosis of pulp-related changes.
Brynolf I
Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1979; 52(2):25-47. PubMed ID: 287607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of the lamina dura.
Hubar JS
J Can Dent Assoc; 1993 Dec; 59(12):997-1000. PubMed ID: 8275394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The contribution of trabecular bone to the visibility of the lamina dura: an in vitro radiographic study.
Cavalcanti MG; Ruprecht A; Johnson WT; Southard TE; Jakobsen J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 11805787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forensic oral imaging quality of hand-held dental X-ray devices: comparison of two image receptors and two devices.
Pittayapat P; Thevissen P; Fieuws S; Jacobs R; Willems G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Jan; 194(1-3):20-7. PubMed ID: 19913377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT.
Hashimoto K; Kawashima S; Araki M; Iwai K; Sawada K; Akiyama Y
J Oral Sci; 2006 Mar; 48(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16617198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of interpretations of full-mouth and panoramic surveys.
Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kerber PE; Paule CL
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Sep; 44(3):468-75. PubMed ID: 269343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital analysis of trabecular pattern in jaws of patients with sickle cell anemia.
White SC; Cohen JM; Mourshed FA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 10808227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiography of the periapical region as a diagnostic aid. I. Diagnosis of marginal changes.
Brynolf I
Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1978; 51(2):21-39. PubMed ID: 278766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between standardized periapical and bitewing radiographs in assessing alveolar bone loss.
Albandar JM; Abbas DK; Waerhaug M; Gjermo P
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1985 Aug; 13(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 3862504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted densitometric image analysis of digital subtraction images: in vivo error of the method and effect of thresholding.
Brägger U; Bürgin W; Fourmousis I; Schmid G; Schild U; Lang NP
J Periodontol; 1998 Sep; 69(9):967-74. PubMed ID: 9776024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing a Novel 3D Printed Radiographic Imaging Device for Use in Forensic Odontology.
Newcomb TL; Bruhn AM; Giles B; Garcia HM; Diawara N
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):223-228. PubMed ID: 27859228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs.
Jolley L; Majumdar S; Kapila S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):393-7. PubMed ID: 17082328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
Molander B
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dental radiographic identification utilising computerised digital slice interposition: a case report.
Tai CC; Blenkinsop BR; Wood RE
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1993 Jun; 11(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9227060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
