270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16223538)
1. Visual illusions affect both movement planning and on-line control: a multiple cue position on bias and goal-directed action.
Mendoza J; Hansen S; Glazebrook CM; Keetch KM; Elliott D
Hum Mov Sci; 2005; 24(5-6):760-73. PubMed ID: 16223538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
Mendoza JE; Elliott D; Meegan DV; Lyons JL; Welsh TN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 16634679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?
Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Keetch KM; Lyons J; Amazeen E; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15300347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Ebbinghaus illusion affects on-line movement control.
Handlovsky I; Hansen S; Lee TD; Elliott D
Neurosci Lett; 2004 Aug; 366(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 15288440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
Dewar MT; Carey DP
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.
van Doorn H; van der Kamp J; de Wit M; Savelsbergh GJ
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):804-12. PubMed ID: 19118565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The hand knows something that the eye does not: reaching movements resist the Müller-Lyer illusion whether or not the target is foveated.
Thompson AA; Westwood DA
Neurosci Lett; 2007 Oct; 426(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17890003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Müller-Lyer illusion affects the planning and control of manual aiming movements.
Meegan DV; Glazebrook CM; Dhillon VP; Tremblay L; Welsh TN; Elliott D
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 155(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 15064883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of response uncertainty on illusory biases of perception and action.
Keetch KM; Glazebrook CM; Lyons J; Lam MY; Weeks DJ; Elliott D
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 406(1-2):117-21. PubMed ID: 16901634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Allocentric visual cues influence online limb adjustments.
Heath M; Neely K; Binsted G
Motor Control; 2007 Jan; 11(1):54-70. PubMed ID: 17392567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Goal-directed aiming and the relative contribution of two online control processes.
Grierson LE; Elliott D
Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 19827701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion.
de Wit M; van der Kamp J; Masters RS
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1903-9. PubMed ID: 21420989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Taking aim at the Müller-Lyer goalkeeper illusion: an illusion bias in action that originates from the target not being optically specified.
Shim J; van der Kamp J; Rigby BR; Lutz R; Poolton JM; Masters RS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1274-81. PubMed ID: 24730741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion.
Króliczak G; Heard P; Goodale MA; Gregory RL
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 16516866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.
Predebon J
Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 15654590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A metanalysis of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccadic eye movements: no general support for a dissociation of perception and oculomotor action.
Bruno N; Knox PC; de Grave DD
Vision Res; 2010 Dec; 50(24):2671-82. PubMed ID: 20858510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.
Heath M; Rival C; Binsted G
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 15278330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.
Franz VH; Hesse C; Kollath S
Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1518-31. PubMed ID: 18834894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
