4429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16224307)
1. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.
Quan H; Sundararajan V; Halfon P; Fong A; Burnand B; Luthi JC; Saunders LD; Beck CA; Feasby TE; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2005 Nov; 43(11):1130-9. PubMed ID: 16224307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stroke: the Elixhauser Index for comorbidity adjustment of in-hospital case fatality.
Zhu H; Hill MD
Neurology; 2008 Jul; 71(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 18645167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk adjustment performance of Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in ICD-9 and ICD-10 administrative databases.
Li B; Evans D; Faris P; Dean S; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jan; 8():12. PubMed ID: 18194561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New ICD-10 version of the Multipurpose Australian Comorbidity Scoring System outperformed Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidities in an older population.
Toson B; Harvey LA; Close JC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():62-69. PubMed ID: 27101889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptation and Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Score for ICD-10-CM.
Sun JW; Rogers JR; Her Q; Welch EC; Panozzo CA; Toh S; Gagne JJ
Med Care; 2017 Dec; 55(12):1046-1051. PubMed ID: 29087983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ICD-10-CA/CCI coding algorithms for defining clinical variables to assess outcome after aortic and mitral valve replacement surgery.
Quan H
Can J Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 22(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 16485052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Elixhauser and Charlson/Deyo methods of comorbidity measurement in administrative data.
Southern DA; Quan H; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2004 Apr; 42(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 15076812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICD-10 coding algorithms for defining comorbidities of acute myocardial infarction.
So L; Evans D; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Dec; 6():161. PubMed ID: 17173686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.
Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
Med Care; 2002 Aug; 40(8):675-85. PubMed ID: 12187181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation of ICD-10 in Canada: how has it impacted coded hospital discharge data?
Walker RL; Hennessy DA; Johansen H; Sambell C; Lix L; Quan H
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Jun; 12():149. PubMed ID: 22682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing and using comorbidity measures in elderly veterans with lower extremity amputations.
Kurichi JE; Stineman MG; Kwong PL; Bates BE; Reker DM
Gerontology; 2007; 53(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 17435390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Combined Comorbidity Index of Charlson and Elixhauser to Predict 30-Day Mortality Across ICD-9 and ICD-10.
Simard M; Sirois C; Candas B
Med Care; 2018 May; 56(5):441-447. PubMed ID: 29578951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Charlson scores based on ICD-10 administrative data were valid in assessing comorbidity in patients undergoing urological cancer surgery.
Nuttall M; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16488357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.
Sundararajan V; Henderson T; Perry C; Muggivan A; Quan H; Ghali WA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1288-94. PubMed ID: 15617955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploration of ICD-9-CM coding of chronic disease within the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure in patients with chronic heart failure.
Garvin JH; Redd A; Bolton D; Graham P; Roche D; Groeneveld P; Leecaster M; Shen S; Weiner MG
Perspect Health Inf Manag; 2013; 10(Fall):1b. PubMed ID: 24159270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index.
Sundararajan V; Quan H; Halfon P; Fushimi K; Luthi JC; Burnand B; Ghali WA;
Med Care; 2007 Dec; 45(12):1210-5. PubMed ID: 18007172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of ICD-10 Coding System for Identifying Comorbidities and Infectious Conditions Using Data from a Thai University Hospital Administrative Database.
Rattanaumpawan P; Wongkamhla T; Thamlikitkul V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 27396219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practices.
Bottle A; Aylin P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1426-33. PubMed ID: 21764557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simple Excel and ICD-10 based dataset calculator for the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices.
Prommik P; Tootsi K; Saluse T; Strauss E; Kolk H; Märtson A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):4. PubMed ID: 34996364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does date stamping ICD-9-CM codes increase the value of clinical information in administrative data?
Glance LG; Dick AW; Osler TM; Mukamel DB
Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 41(1):231-51. PubMed ID: 16430609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
