These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16224780)

  • 1. Focused library design in GPCR projects on the example of 5-HT(2c) agonists: comparison of structure-based virtual screening with ligand-based search methods.
    Bissantz C; Schalon C; Guba W; Stahl M
    Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):938-52. PubMed ID: 16224780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
    Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
    Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of structure- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols considering hit list complementarity and enrichment factors.
    Krüger DM; Evers A
    ChemMedChem; 2010 Jan; 5(1):148-58. PubMed ID: 19908272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GPCR structure-based virtual screening approach for CB2 antagonist search.
    Chen JZ; Wang J; Xie XQ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1626-37. PubMed ID: 17580929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of novel serotonin 2C receptor ligands by sequential virtual screening.
    Ahmed A; Choo H; Cho YS; Park WK; Pae AN
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2009 Jul; 17(13):4559-68. PubMed ID: 19464901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ligand-based structural hypotheses for virtual screening.
    Jain AN
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 14761196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for designing GPCR-focused libraries and screening sets.
    Jimonet P; Jäger R
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2004 May; 7(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 15216936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy.
    Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
    Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalization of a targeted library design protocol: application to 5-HT7 receptor ligands.
    Nordling E; Homan E
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2207-15. PubMed ID: 15554691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets.
    Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches.
    Eckert H; Bajorath J
    Drug Discov Today; 2007 Mar; 12(5-6):225-33. PubMed ID: 17331887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. G-protein-coupled receptor affinity prediction based on the use of a profiling dataset: QSAR design, synthesis, and experimental validation.
    Rolland C; Gozalbes R; Nicolaï E; Paugam MF; Coussy L; Barbosa F; Horvath D; Revah F
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(21):6563-74. PubMed ID: 16220973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Homology modeling and docking evaluation of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.
    McRobb FM; Capuano B; Crosby IT; Chalmers DK; Yuriev E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Apr; 50(4):626-37. PubMed ID: 20187660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A knowledge-based weighting approach to ligand-based virtual screening.
    Stiefl N; Zaliani A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):587-96. PubMed ID: 16562987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of a pharmacophore model for 5-HT4 agonists using CoMFA and receptor based alignment.
    Iskander MN; Leung LM; Buley T; Ayad F; Di Iulio J; Tan YY; Coupar IM
    Eur J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 41(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 16293350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A screening library for peptide activated G-protein coupled receptors. 1. The test set.
    Lavrador K; Murphy B; Saunders J; Struthers S; Wang X; Williams J
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6864-74. PubMed ID: 15615535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of protein-ligand interaction fingerprints in docking.
    Brewerton SC
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 18428089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. G-protein-coupled receptor-focused drug discovery using a target class platform approach.
    Heilker R; Wolff M; Tautermann CS; Bieler M
    Drug Discov Today; 2009 Mar; 14(5-6):231-40. PubMed ID: 19121411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.