These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16225517)
1. Intra-operative prostate examination: predictive value and effect on margin status. Rapp DE; Orvieto MA; Lucioni A; Gong EM; Shalhav AL; Brendler CB BJU Int; 2005 Nov; 96(7):1005-8. PubMed ID: 16225517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Tsuzuki T; Hernandez DJ; Aydin H; Trock B; Walsh PC; Epstein JI J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):450-3. PubMed ID: 15643200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Location of a positive biopsy as a predictor of surgical margin status and extraprostatic disease in radical prostatectomy. Touma NJ; Chin JL; Bella T; Sener A; Izawa JI BJU Int; 2006 Feb; 97(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 16430624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical retropubic prostatectomy. How often do experienced surgeons have positive surgical margins when there is extraprostatic extension in the region of the neurovascular bundle? Hernandez DJ; Epstein JI; Trock BJ; Tsuzuki T; Carter HB; Walsh PC J Urol; 2005 Feb; 173(2):446-9. PubMed ID: 15643199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side specific extraprostatic cancer extension. Naya Y; Slaton JW; Troncoso P; Okihara K; Babaian RJ J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1093-7. PubMed ID: 14767278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lepor H; Kaci L Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 15028445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins. Cannon GM; Pound CR; Landsittel DP; Bastacky SI; Dhir R; Becich MJ; Nelson JB Prostate; 2005 Jun; 63(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 15602747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the value of intraoperative frozen sections. Dillenburg W; Poulakis V; Witzsch U; de Vries R; Skriapas K; Altmansberger HM; Becht E Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 16054291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of preoperative endorectal MRI stage classification on neurovascular bundle sparing aggressiveness and the radical prostatectomy positive margin rate. Brown JA; Rodin DM; Harisinghani M; Dahl DM Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 18640062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens. Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Secin FP; Serio A; Bianco FJ; Karanikolas NT; Kuroiwa K; Vickers A; Touijer K; Guillonneau B Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 17098356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. Orvieto MA; Alsikafi NF; Shalhav AL; Laven BA; Steinberg GD; Zagaja GP; Brendler CB BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 17125478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy. Labanaris AP; Zugor V; Takriti S; Smiszek R; Engelhard K; Nutzel R; Kuhn R Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18759166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens. Marks RA; Koch MO; Lopez-Beltran A; Montironi R; Juliar BE; Cheng L Hum Pathol; 2007 Aug; 38(8):1207-11. PubMed ID: 17490720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Cheng L; Jones TD; Lin H; Eble JN; Zeng G; Carr MD; Koch MO J Urol; 2005 Dec; 174(6):2181-5. PubMed ID: 16280760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy. Touijer K; Kuroiwa K; Eastham JA; Vickers A; Reuter VE; Scardino PT; Guillonneau B Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1090-6. PubMed ID: 17188801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]