247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16225563)
1. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Moraitis AA; Shreeve N; Sovio U; Brocklehurst P; Heazell AEP; Thornton JG; Robson SC; Papageorghiou A; Smith GC
PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003190. PubMed ID: 33048935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
Mazzone E; Dall'Asta A; Kiener AJO; Carpano MG; Suprani A; Ghi T; Frusca T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malin GL; Bugg GJ; Takwoingi Y; Thornton JG; Jones NW
BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia.
Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN
J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
Ben-Haroush A; Melamed N; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Yogev Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Third trimester ultrasound for fetal macrosomia: optimal timing and institutional specific accuracy.
Parikh LI; Iqbal SN; Jelin AC; Overcash RT; Tefera E; Fries MH
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(8):1337-1341. PubMed ID: 29183184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth.
Hackmon R; Bornstein E; Ferber A; Horani J; O'Reilly Green CP; Divon MY
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):333.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17403410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective pilot study in assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight prior to delivery.
Sekar R; Khatun M; Barrett HL; Duncombe G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26299881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
Sovio U; Smith GCS
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A simulation study to assess the potential benefits of MRI-based fetal weight estimation as a second-line test for suspected macrosomia.
Badr DA; Carlin A; Boulvain M; Kadji C; Cannie MM; Jani JC; Gucciardo L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():126-131. PubMed ID: 38615575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection.
Pagani G; Palai N; Zatti S; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
