These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16225563)

  • 1. Accuracy of ultrasound biometry in the prediction of macrosomia: a systematic quantitative review.
    Coomarasamy A; Connock M; Thornton J; Khan KS
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1461-6. PubMed ID: 16225563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
    Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Moraitis AA; Shreeve N; Sovio U; Brocklehurst P; Heazell AEP; Thornton JG; Robson SC; Papageorghiou A; Smith GC
    PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003190. PubMed ID: 33048935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Mazzone E; Dall'Asta A; Kiener AJO; Carpano MG; Suprani A; Ghi T; Frusca T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malin GL; Bugg GJ; Takwoingi Y; Thornton JG; Jones NW
    BJOG; 2016 Jan; 123(1):77-88. PubMed ID: 26224221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?
    Combs CA; Rosenn B; Miodovnik M; Siddiqi TA
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2000; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used.
    Melamed N; Yogev Y; Meizner I; Mashiach R; Pardo J; Ben-Haroush A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21229567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of fundal height measurement and sonographically measured fetal abdominal circumference in the prediction of high and low birth weight at term.
    Kayem G; Grangé G; Bréart G; Goffinet F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 34(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 19582801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intrapartum fetal abdominal circumference by ultrasonography for predicting fetal macrosomia.
    Loetworawanit R; Chittacharoen A; Sututvoravut S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Oct; 89 Suppl 4():S60-4. PubMed ID: 17726811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.
    Tuuli MG; Kapalka K; Macones GA; Cahill AG
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1925-30. PubMed ID: 27466257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of fetal macrosomia by single ultrasonic fetal biometry.
    Chen CP; Chang FM; Chang CH; Lin YS; Chou CY; Ko HC
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 Jan; 92(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8099822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Panunzi C; Cardinali F; Khalil A; Mustafa HJ; Spinillo A; Rizzo G; Flacco ME; Maruotti G; D'Antonio F
    J Perinat Med; 2024 Jul; 52(6):623-632. PubMed ID: 38860644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal abdominal circumference measurements of 35 and 38 cm as predictors of macrosomia. A risk factor for shoulder dystocia.
    Gilby JR; Williams MC; Spellacy WN
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Nov; 45(11):936-8. PubMed ID: 11127108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the amniotic fluid index combined with estimated fetal weight within 10 days of delivery for prediction of macrosomia at birth.
    Ben-Haroush A; Melamed N; Mashiach R; Meizner I; Yogev Y
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Jul; 27(7):1029-32. PubMed ID: 18577666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Third trimester ultrasound for fetal macrosomia: optimal timing and institutional specific accuracy.
    Parikh LI; Iqbal SN; Jelin AC; Overcash RT; Tefera E; Fries MH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Apr; 32(8):1337-1341. PubMed ID: 29183184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Combined analysis with amniotic fluid index and estimated fetal weight for prediction of severe macrosomia at birth.
    Hackmon R; Bornstein E; Ferber A; Horani J; O'Reilly Green CP; Divon MY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):333.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17403410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective pilot study in assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight prior to delivery.
    Sekar R; Khatun M; Barrett HL; Duncombe G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26299881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinded ultrasound fetal biometry at 36 weeks and risk of emergency Cesarean delivery in a prospective cohort study of low-risk nulliparous women.
    Sovio U; Smith GCS
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 28452133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simulation study to assess the potential benefits of MRI-based fetal weight estimation as a second-line test for suspected macrosomia.
    Badr DA; Carlin A; Boulvain M; Kadji C; Cannie MM; Jani JC; Gucciardo L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():126-131. PubMed ID: 38615575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.