These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16226419)

  • 1. Dealing with allelic dropout when reporting the evidential value in DNA relatedness analysis.
    Buckleton J; Triggs C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):134-9. PubMed ID: 16226419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of DNA-based identification software by computation of pedigree likelihood ratios.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 20727843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of DNA to the disaster victim identification (DVI) effort.
    Hartman D; Drummer O; Eckhoff C; Scheffer JW; Stringer P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):52-8. PubMed ID: 21106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating forensic DNA profiles using peak heights, allowing for multiple donors, allelic dropout and stutters.
    Puch-Solis R; Rodgers L; Mazumder A; Pope S; Evett I; Curran J; Balding D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2013 Sep; 7(5):555-63. PubMed ID: 23948327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examples of kinship analysis where Profiler Plus™ was not discriminatory enough for the identification of victims using DNA identification.
    Hartman D; Benton L; Morenos L; Beyer J; Spiden M; Stock A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):64-8. PubMed ID: 20970265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Models and implementation for relationship problems with dropout.
    Dørum G; Kling D; Baeza-Richer C; García-Magariños M; Sæbø S; Desmyter S; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 May; 129(3):411-23. PubMed ID: 25108449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
    Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of extended kinship analyses utilizing commercial STR kit in establishing personal identification.
    Yoshida K; Yayama K; Hatanaka A; Tamaki K
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2011 Jan; 13(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 20952240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of mock cases involving complex low template DNA mixtures: A descriptive study.
    Benschop CC; Haned H; de Blaeij TJ; Meulenbroek AJ; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):697-707. PubMed ID: 22613779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of allelic dropout on evidential value of forensic DNA profiles using RMNE.
    Van Nieuwerburgh F; Goetghebeur E; Vandewoestyne M; Deforce D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 19029128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilising allelic dropout probabilities estimated by logistic regression in casework.
    Buckleton J; Kelly H; Bright JA; Taylor D; Tvedebrink T; Curran JM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():9-11. PubMed ID: 24528573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification by DNA analysis of the victims of the August 1996 Spitsbergen civil aircraft disaster.
    Olaisen B; Stenersen M; Mevåg B
    Nat Genet; 1997 Apr; 15(4):402-5. PubMed ID: 9090388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles.
    Gill P; Kirkham A; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Mar; 166(2-3):128-38. PubMed ID: 16759831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains.
    Buckleton JS; Curran JM; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Mar; 1(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19083724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interpretation of complex DNA profiles using empirical models and a method to measure their robustness.
    Gill P; Curran J; Neumann C; Kirkham A; Clayton T; Whitaker J; Lambert J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Mar; 2(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 19083804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of Guthrie cards and other medical samples for the direct matching of disaster victims using DNA profiling.
    Hartman D; Benton L; Morenos L; Beyer J; Spiden M; Stock A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Feb; 205(1-3):59-63. PubMed ID: 20691551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Weir BS
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):987-95. PubMed ID: 10486951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Familial searching on DNA mixtures with dropout.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():128-138. PubMed ID: 26905597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioinformatics and human identification in mass fatality incidents: the world trade center disaster.
    Leclair B; Shaler R; Carmody GR; Eliason K; Hendrickson BC; Judkins T; Norton MJ; Sears C; Scholl T
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):806-19. PubMed ID: 17524061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.