187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16226427)
21. [Study on the use of haemoglobin denaturation test as an alternative to Draize eye irritation test].
Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang LS; Li GM; Zhang BX
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 Sep; 35(5):654-7. PubMed ID: 15460411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Mucosal irritation potential of polyelectrolyte multilayer capsules.
De Cock LJ; Lenoir J; De Koker S; Vermeersch V; Skirtach AG; Dubruel P; Adriaens E; Vervaet C; Remon JP; De Geest BG
Biomaterials; 2011 Mar; 32(7):1967-77. PubMed ID: 21126762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Chemical diversity approach for evaluating mechanistic relatedness among toxicological phenomena.
Pollack N; Cunningham AR; Klopman G; Rosenkranz HS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999 Dec; 10(6):533-43. PubMed ID: 10674291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CON4EI: Development of serious eye damage and eye irritation testing strategies with respect to the requirements of the UN GHS/EU CLP hazard categories.
Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():2-5. PubMed ID: 28629855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of ocular discomfort caused by 5 shampoos using the Slug Mucosal Irritation test.
Petit JY; Doré V; Marignac G; Perrot S
Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Apr; 40():243-247. PubMed ID: 28063820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The evaluation of the local tolerance of vaginal formulations, with or without nonoxynol-9, using the slug mucosal irritation test.
Dhondt MM; Adriaens E; Remon JP
Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Apr; 31(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 15028937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Molecular restrictions for human eye irritation by chemical vapors.
Cometto-Muñiz JE; Cain WS; Abraham MH
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 16129116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The isolated chicken eye test as a suitable in vitro method for determining the eye irritation potential of household cleaning products.
Schutte K; Prinsen MK; McNamee PM; Roggeband R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 54(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 19460408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The minipig in dermatotoxicology: methods and challenges.
Mahl JA; Vogel BE; Court M; Kolopp M; Roman D; Nogués V
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2006 Jul; 57(5-6):341-5. PubMed ID: 16713702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Molecular analysis of predation by carabid beetles (Carabidae) on the invasive Iberian slug Arion lusitanicus.
Hatteland BA; Symondson WO; King RA; Skage M; Schander C; Solhøy T
Bull Entomol Res; 2011 Dec; 101(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 21342604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Potential Mucosal Irritation Discrimination of Surface Disinfectants Employed against SARS-CoV-2 by
Cutuli MA; Guarnieri A; Pietrangelo L; Magnifico I; Venditti N; Recchia L; Mangano K; Nicoletti F; Di Marco R; Petronio Petronio G
Biomedicines; 2021 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 33919850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predation by beetles (Carabidae, Staphylinidae) on eggs and juveniles of the Iberian slug Arion lusitanicus in the laboratory.
Hatteland BA; Grutle K; Mong CE; Skartveit J; Symondson WO; Solhøy T
Bull Entomol Res; 2010 Oct; 100(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 20158927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. CON4EI: EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (EpiOcular™ EIT) for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals.
Kandarova H; Letasiova S; Adriaens E; Guest R; Willoughby JA; Drzewiecka A; Gruszka K; Alépée N; Verstraelen S; Van Rompay AR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2018 Jun; 49():21-33. PubMed ID: 28697962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro quantitative determination of ophthalmic irritancy by the chorioallantoic membrane test with trypan blue staining as alternative to eye irritation test.
Lagarto A; Vega R; Guerra I; González R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 16309878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. In vitro eye irritancy test of lauryl derivatives using the reconstructed rabbit corneal epithelium model.
Matsuda S; Hisama M; Shibayama H; Itou N; Iwaki M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Jun; 23(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 19490837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation study of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals.
Sakaguchi H; Ota N; Omori T; Kuwahara H; Sozu T; Takagi Y; Takahashi Y; Tanigawa K; Nakanishi M; Nakamura T; Morimoto T; Wakuri S; Okamoto Y; Sakaguchi M; Hayashi T; Hanji T; Watanabe S
Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Jun; 25(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 21291995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Using in vitro prediction models instead of the rabbit eye irritation test to classify and label new chemicals: a post hoc data analysis of the international EC/HO validation study.
Moldenhauer F
Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 16221042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals.
Hoffmann S; Saliner AG; Patlewicz G; Eskes C; Zuang V; Worth AP
Toxicol Lett; 2008 Jul; 180(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18585875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prediction models for eye irritation potential based on endpoints of the HETCAM and neutral red uptake tests.
Worth AP; Cronin MT
In Vitr Mol Toxicol; 2001; 14(3):143-56. PubMed ID: 11846988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative study of red blood cell method in rat and calves blood as alternatives of Draize eye irritation test.
Lagarto A; Vega R; Vega Y; Guerra I; González R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Jun; 20(4):529-33. PubMed ID: 16293391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
