298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16226452)
1. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast.
Liberi G; Cotta-Ramusino C; Lopes M; Sogo J; Conti C; Bensimon A; Foiani M
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():442-62. PubMed ID: 16793417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
Lambert S; Carr AM
Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.
Budzowska M; Kanaar R
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2009; 53(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 19034694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. BRCA1 regulates RAD51 function in response to DNA damage and suppresses spontaneous sister chromatid replication slippage: implications for sister chromatid cohesion, genome stability, and carcinogenesis.
Cousineau I; Abaji C; Belmaaza A
Cancer Res; 2005 Dec; 65(24):11384-91. PubMed ID: 16357146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
Osman F; Whitby MC
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks.
Kanoh Y; Tamai K; Shirahige K
Gene; 2006 Aug; 377():88-95. PubMed ID: 16753272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Checkpoint and coordinated cellular responses to DNA damage.
Yang XH; Zou L
Results Probl Cell Differ; 2006; 42():65-92. PubMed ID: 16903208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recruitment of ATR-ATRIP, Rad17, and 9-1-1 complexes to DNA damage.
Yang XH; Zou L
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():118-31. PubMed ID: 16793398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Redundancy, insult-specific sensors and thresholds: unlocking the S-phase checkpoint response.
Cobb JA; Shimada K; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2004 Jun; 14(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 15172673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The novel gene mus7(+) is involved in the repair of replication-associated DNA damage in fission yeast.
Yokoyama M; Inoue H; Ishii C; Murakami Y
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jun; 6(6):770-80. PubMed ID: 17307401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posttranslational modifications of repair factors and histones in the cellular response to stalled replication forks.
Schleker T; Nagai S; Gasser SM
DNA Repair (Amst); 2009 Sep; 8(9):1089-100. PubMed ID: 19482523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Caffeine delays replication fork progression and enhances UV-induced homologous recombination in Chinese hamster cell lines.
Johansson F; Lagerqvist A; Filippi S; Palitti F; Erixon K; Helleday T; Jenssen D
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 Dec; 5(12):1449-58. PubMed ID: 16968677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.
Michel B; Grompone G; Florès MJ; Bidnenko V
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Aug; 101(35):12783-8. PubMed ID: 15328417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7).
Unal E; Heidinger-Pauli JM; Koshland D
Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5835):245-8. PubMed ID: 17626885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the BLM helicase in replication fork management.
Wu L
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):936-44. PubMed ID: 17363339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
