These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. A rose by any other name is still a rose: assessing journal quality. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2007; 55(4):163-4. PubMed ID: 17678678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process. Giles J Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The real value of the impact factors]. Puche RC Medicina (B Aires); 2003; 63(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 14518150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research. Smith T Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact factors aren't top journals' sole attraction. Törnqvist TE Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480. PubMed ID: 12774096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time. Clarke SP Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors. Colquhoun D Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Encouraging letters to the editor in EMHJ. Afifi M East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Nov; 12(6):933-4. PubMed ID: 17333846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]