These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16226627)

  • 1. Measurement of the pressure applied during motion palpation and reliability for cervical spine rotation.
    Marcotte J; Normand MC; Black P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005 Oct; 28(8):591-6. PubMed ID: 16226627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The kinematics of motion palpation and its effect on the reliability for cervical spine rotation.
    Marcotte J; Normand MC; Black P
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002 Sep; 25(7):E7. PubMed ID: 12214190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.
    Martínez-Segura R; Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Ruiz-Sáez M; López-Jiménez C; Rodríguez-Blanco C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Sep; 29(7):511-7. PubMed ID: 16949939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness.
    Hubka MJ; Phelan SP
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1994; 17(9):591-5. PubMed ID: 7884328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation tests for cervical nonorganic signs: a study of face validity.
    Vernon H; Proctor D; Bakalovski D; Moreton J
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010 Jan; 33(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 20114097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and validity of a palpation technique for identifying the spinous processes of C7 and L5.
    Robinson R; Robinson HS; Bjørke G; Kvale A
    Man Ther; 2009 Aug; 14(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 18793865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in pressure pain sensitivity in latent myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle after a cervical spine manipulation in pain-free subjects.
    Ruiz-Sáez M; Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Blanco CR; Martínez-Segura R; García-León R
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Oct; 30(8):578-83. PubMed ID: 17996549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation into the validity of cervical spine motion palpation using subjects with congenital block vertebrae as a 'gold standard'.
    Humphreys BK; Delahaye M; Peterson CK
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2004 Jun; 5():19. PubMed ID: 15198806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra- and interobserver reliability of passive motion palpation of the lumbar spine.
    Mootz RD; Keating JC; Kontz HP; Milus TB; Jacobs GE
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1989 Dec; 12(6):440-5. PubMed ID: 2628523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in neck pain and active range of motion after a single thoracic spine manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a case series.
    Fernández-de-las-Peñas C; Palomeque-del-Cerro L; Rodríguez-Blanco C; Gómez-Conesa A; Miangolarra-Page JC
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 May; 30(4):312-20. PubMed ID: 17509440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical segmental motion induced by shoulder abduction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Takasaki H; Hall T; Kaneko S; Iizawa T; Ikemoto Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):E122-6. PubMed ID: 19179912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Reliability of manual medical examination techniques of the cervical spine. Study of quality assurance in manual diagnosis].
    Schöps P; Pfingsten M; Siebert U
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 10730356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a sham manipulative procedure for the cervical spine for use in clinical trials.
    Vernon H; MacAdam K; Marshall V; Pion M; Sadowska M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2005; 28(9):662-6. PubMed ID: 16326235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring the posteroanterior stiffness of the cervical spine.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    Man Ther; 2008 Dec; 13(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 17910931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine.
    Smedmark V; Wallin M; Arvidsson I
    Man Ther; 2000 May; 5(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 10903585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jan; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17224351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neck-tongue syndrome.
    Borody C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Jun; 27(5):e8. PubMed ID: 15195046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interexaminer reproducibility of physical examination of the cervical spine.
    Pool JJ; Hoving JL; de Vet HC; van Mameren H; Bouter LM
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2004 Feb; 27(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 14970808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion palpation used as a postmanipulation assessment tool for monitoring end-feel improvement: a randomized controlled trial of test responsiveness.
    Lakhani E; Nook B; Haas M; Docrat A
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Sep; 32(7):549-55. PubMed ID: 19748406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
    Arab AM; Abdollahi I; Joghataei MT; Golafshani Z; Kazemnejad A
    Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 18373938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.