200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16227175)
1. Thresholds as a unifying theme in regulatory toxicology.
Cheeseman MA
Food Addit Contam; 2005 Oct; 22(10):900-6. PubMed ID: 16227175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing computational toxicology models with phytochemicals.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Busta E; Minnier BL; Kruhlak NL; Benz RD
Mol Nutr Food Res; 2010 Feb; 54(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 20024931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of structure-activity relationship analysis in the food contact notification program.
Bailey AB; Chanderbhan R; Collazo-Braier N; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 15935536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing.
Kroes R; Galli C; Munro I; Schilter B; Tran L; Walker R; Würtzen G
Food Chem Toxicol; 2000; 38(2-3):255-312. PubMed ID: 10717364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of thresholds on the risk assessment of carcinogens in food.
Pratt I; Barlow S; Kleiner J; Larsen JC
Mutat Res; 2009 Aug; 678(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19442758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches to the risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens in food: a critical appraisal.
O'Brien J; Renwick AG; Constable A; Dybing E; Müller DJ; Schlatter J; Slob W; Tueting W; van Benthem J; Williams GM; Wolfreys A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2006 Oct; 44(10):1613-35. PubMed ID: 16887251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment of chemical carcinogens and thresholds.
Neumann HG
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 19545196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved in silico prediction of carcinogenic potency (TD50) and the risk specific dose (RSD) adjusted Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) for genotoxic chemicals and pharmaceutical impurities.
Contrera JF
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 20933038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for the evaluation of chemicals for carcinogenicity. Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.
Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond); 1991; 42():1-80. PubMed ID: 1763238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceutical manufacturing operations.
Dolan DG; Naumann BD; Sargent EV; Maier A; Dourson M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16099564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Problems in prediction of toxicity and risk of effects of chemical substances on public health].
Rumiantsev GI; Novikov SM
Gig Sanit; 1997; (6):13-8. PubMed ID: 9483844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Structure-activity relationship analysis tools: validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens.
Mayer J; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Feb; 50(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 18023949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. US FDA's revised consumption factor for polystyrene used in food-contact applications.
Cassidy K; Elyashiv-Barad S
Food Addit Contam; 2007 Sep; 24(9):1026-31. PubMed ID: 17691017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Utilize of mathematical modeling methods for human health risk assessment from exposure to food contaminants].
Dzhatdoeva AA; Khotimchenko SA
Vopr Pitan; 2005; 74(4):46-52. PubMed ID: 16265917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproductive toxicants have a threshold of adversity.
Piersma AH; Hernandez LG; van Benthem J; Muller JJ; van Leeuwen FX; Vermeire TG; van Raaij MT
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Jul; 41(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 21609253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Data gaps in toxicity testing of chemicals allowed in food in the United States.
Neltner TG; Alger HM; Leonard JE; Maffini MV
Reprod Toxicol; 2013 Dec; 42():85-94. PubMed ID: 23954440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk assessment of packaging materials.
Munro C; Hlywka JJ; Kennepohl EM
Food Addit Contam; 2002; 19 Suppl():3-12. PubMed ID: 11962713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
