These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16227478)

  • 1. Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment.
    Parissis N; Kondylidou-Sidira A; Tsirlis A; Patias P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Nov; 34(6):353-6. PubMed ID: 16227478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
    Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental radiology: capture your image.
    Brocklebank LM
    Dent Update; 1998 Apr; 25(3):94-6, 98, 100-2. PubMed ID: 9791202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digitizing of radiographs with a flatbed scanner.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    J Dent; 1995 Aug; 23(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 7629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Gröndahl HG; Ekestubbe A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15140820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices.
    Berkhout WE; Sanderink GC; Van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 12775667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digitally Scanned Radiographs versus Conventional Films for Determining Clarity of Periapical Lesions and Quality of Root Canal Treatment.
    Almanei K; Alsulaimani R; Alfadda S; Albabtain S; Alsulaimani R
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2017; 2017():2427060. PubMed ID: 29270461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A comparative study of analog and digital intraoral x-ray image detector systems].
    Blendl C; Stengel C; Zdunczyk S
    Rofo; 2000 Jun; 172(6):534-41. PubMed ID: 10916550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical and comparative study of the image quality of 3 digital radiographic systems, E-speed film and digitalized film]].
    Bóscolo FN; de Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 11787321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital images obtained with a digital camera are not associated with a loss of critical information--a preliminary study.
    Peretz B; Kaffe I; Amir E
    Br Dent J; 2009 Mar; 206(5):E9; discussion 268-9. PubMed ID: 19265830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conversion of teaching file cases from film to digital format: a comparison between use of a diagnostic-quality digitizer and use of a flatbed scanner with transparency adapter.
    Bassignani MJ; Bubash-Faust L; Ciambotti J; Moran R; McIlhenny J
    Acad Radiol; 2003 May; 10(5):536-42. PubMed ID: 12755543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance in oral radiography: computer-based methods for assessment and controlled improvement of intraoral radiographs.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Seipel S; Schneider W
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1707. PubMed ID: 8591562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality of conventional radiographs and their digital counterparts.
    Peretz B
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2006 Jul; 24(3):96. PubMed ID: 17091627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of manipulation accuracy of digitized occlusal radiographic images--sub and over exposure.
    Maschtakow PS; Moraes ME; Soares MG; Santos LR; Moraes LC; Castilho JC
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2009; 22(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19839487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.