These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16228104)
1. A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations. Blake GM; Chinn DJ; Steel SA; Patel R; Panayiotou E; Thorpe J; Fordham JN; Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2149-56. PubMed ID: 16228104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of the United Kingdom National Osteoporosis Society position statement on the use of peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2004 Jun; 15(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 15205722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Heel bone densitometry: device specific thresholds for the assessment of osteoporosis. McCauley E; Mackie A; Elliott D; Chuck A Br J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 79(942):464-7. PubMed ID: 16714746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice. Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Alara Metriscan phalangeal densitometer: evaluation and triage thresholds. Thorpe JA; Steel SA Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):778-83. PubMed ID: 18591198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis. de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ability of peripheral DXA measurements of the forearm to predict low axial bone mineral density at menopause. Pouillès JM; Tremollières FA; Martinez S; Delsol M; Ribot C Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 11305086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone mineral density measurement in the calcaneus with DXL: comparison with hip and spine measurements in a cross-sectional study of an elderly female population. Salminen H; Sääf M; Ringertz H; Strender LE Osteoporos Int; 2005 May; 16(5):541-51. PubMed ID: 15448984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peripheral and central measurements of bone mineral density are equally strongly associated with clinical risk factors for osteoporosis. Patel R; Blake GM; Fogelman I Calcif Tissue Int; 2007 Feb; 80(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17308990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The DXL Calscan heel densitometer: evaluation and diagnostic thresholds. Thorpe JA; Steel SA Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):336-41. PubMed ID: 16585728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese Population-Based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Study. Iki M; Kagamimori S; Kagawa Y; Matsuzaki T; Yoneshima H; Marumo F Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):529-37. PubMed ID: 11527049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry. El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of a phalangeal bone mineral density assessment system. Patel R; Blake GM; Panayiotou E; Fogelman I J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 20554233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study of computed digital absorptiometry and conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women. Fiter J; Nolla JM; Gómez-Vaquero C; Martínez-Aguilá D; Valverde J; Roig-Escofet D Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(7):565-9. PubMed ID: 11527054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does osteoporosis classification using heel BMD agree across manufacturers? Grigorian M; Shepherd JA; Cheng XG; Njeh CF; Toschke JO; Genant HK Osteoporos Int; 2002 Aug; 13(8):613-7. PubMed ID: 12181618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis. Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phalangeal densitometry compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of bone mineral density in elderly women. Dhainaut A; Rohde G; Hoff M; Syversen U; Haugeberg G J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Dec; 20(12):1789-95. PubMed ID: 21970521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS). Pedrazzoni M; Girasole G; Bertoldo F; Bianchi G; Cepollaro C; Del Puente A; Giannini S; Gonnelli S; Maggio D; Marcocci C; Minisola S; Palummeri E; Rossini M; Sartori L; Sinigaglia L Osteoporos Int; 2003 Dec; 14(12):978-82. PubMed ID: 14530829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in Thai women using the Osteosys Dexxum T-bone densitometer. Pongchaiyakul C; Kotruchin P J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 23991594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]