417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16228152)
1. [Measurement of cardiac output].
Reuter DA; Goetz AE
Anaesthesist; 2005 Nov; 54(11):1135-51; quiz 1152-3. PubMed ID: 16228152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model.
Bajorat J; Hofmockel R; Vagts DA; Janda M; Pohl B; Beck C; Noeldge-Schomburg G
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16390561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.
Teboul JL; Saugel B; Cecconi M; De Backer D; Hofer CK; Monnet X; Perel A; Pinsky MR; Reuter DA; Rhodes A; Squara P; Vincent JL; Scheeren TW
Intensive Care Med; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1350-9. PubMed ID: 27155605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac output in 1998.
Singer M
Heart; 1998 May; 79(5):425-8. PubMed ID: 9659184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock.
Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB
Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Echophysiology: the transesophageal echo probe as a noninvasive Swan-Ganz catheter.
Meersch M; Schmidt C; Zarbock A
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol; 2016 Feb; 29(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26595545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive cardiac output determination: broadening the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring.
Compton F; Schäfer JH
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2009 Mar; 13(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 19147529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the placement of a pulmonary artery catheter still justified solely for the measurement of cardiac output?
Sakka SG; Reinhart K; Wegscheider K; Meier-Hellmann A
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2000 Apr; 14(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 10794326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic gastroplasty in morbidly obese patients.
Dumont L; Mattys M; Mardirosoff C; Picard V; Allé JL; Massaut J
Obes Surg; 1997 Aug; 7(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 9730519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring.
Hett DA; Jonas MM
Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2004 Apr; 20(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 15072778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of cardiac output measurements by six different methods before and after extracorporeal circulation].
Vetchinkin AV; Lebedinskiĭ KM; Kurapeev IS; Slivin OA; Tsiklinskiĭ SA; Nikolaev AV; Kobak AE
Anesteziol Reanimatol; 2007; (5):63-6. PubMed ID: 18051496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of continuous cardiac output monitoring derived from regional impedance cardiography with continuous thermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients.
Bhavya G; Nagaraja PS; Singh NG; Ragavendran S; Sathish N; Manjunath N; Kumar KA; Nayak VB
Ann Card Anaesth; 2020; 23(2):189-192. PubMed ID: 32275034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit: pulmonary artery catheter versus PiCCO].
Gassanov N; Caglayan E; Nia A; Erdmann E; Er F
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Feb; 136(8):376-80. PubMed ID: 21332037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. To Swan or Not to Swan: Indications, Alternatives, and Future Directions.
Rozental O; Thalappillil R; White RS; Tam CW
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):600-615. PubMed ID: 32859489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic measurements after cardiac surgery: transesophageal Doppler versus pulmonary artery catheter.
Sharma J; Bhise M; Singh A; Mehta Y; Trehan N
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2005 Dec; 19(6):746-50. PubMed ID: 16326299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method.
Engoren M; Barbee D
Am J Crit Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 15608107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations].
Mateu Campos ML; Ferrándiz Sellés A; Gruartmoner de Vera G; Mesquida Febrer J; Sabatier Cloarec C; Poveda Hernández Y; García Nogales X
Med Intensiva; 2012; 36(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 22743144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transpulmonary thermodilution: advantages and limits.
Monnet X; Teboul JL
Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):147. PubMed ID: 28625165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison between continuous and intermittent thermodilution measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass operation].
Schulz K; Abel HH; Werning P
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Apr; 32(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 9289022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
