137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16229199)
1. Health plan benefits denied under plan's illegal act exclusion.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2005 Oct; 22(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 16229199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting the subrogation rights of self-insured group health plans.
Irving A; Flaherty K
Empl Benefits J; 2001 Jun; 26(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 11372499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why the capping of AIDS benefits by self-funded employer welfare benefit plans should be actionable under Section 510 of ERISA.
Wells KL
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Jun; ():17-25. PubMed ID: 10538267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Erisa preemption. King v. BlueCross BlueShield, 439 Fed.Appx. 386, 2011 WL 3822023 (5th Cir. 2011). ERISA preemption applies even to former beneficiaries, or those whose benefits have been canceled by a plan, as long as the claims relate to the plan.
Benefits Q; 2012; 28(3):53. PubMed ID: 22950183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Federal Employees Health Benefits Act: health plan for federal employees denied contract action under federal law--Empire HealthChoice Assurance Inc. v. McVeigh.
Gabos K
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 16240744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative care and ERISA erosion.
Gemignani J
Bus Health; 1998 Sep; 16(9):27. PubMed ID: 10185125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Health care continuation coverage. Final rules.
Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor
Fed Regist; 2004 May; 69(102):30083-112. PubMed ID: 15162808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
Rosenbaum S
Milbank Q; 2015 Dec; 93(4):683-6. PubMed ID: 26626981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Marketplace. New U.S. appeals court ruling opens wide holes in ERISA preemption.
Moskowitz DB
Med Health; 1998 Jul; 52(28):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10181086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An analysis of the regulations interpreting and applying the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.
Trucker LA
Empl Benefits J; 1997 Sep; 22(3):32-3. PubMed ID: 10173942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. UR here: the Supreme Court's guide for managed care.
Sage WM
Health Aff (Millwood); 2000; 19(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 10992671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent developments in employee benefits law.
Rose JG; Adler A
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2005; 40(2):345-68. PubMed ID: 15881784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical guide to preemption for self-insured plans.
Wallace AM
Benefits Q; 1998; 14(2):39-41. PubMed ID: 10179243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Second circuit remands malpractice suit arising from ERISA Plan's denial of preauthorization.
Hosp Law Newsl; 2003 May; 20(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 12725211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Profusion of health care laws creates compliance problems for health plans.
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2002 Sep; 11(9):10-2. PubMed ID: 12369342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent developments in health insurance, life insurance, and disability insurance case law.
Hasman JJ; Chittenden WA; Doolin EG
Tort Insur Law J; 2002; 37(2):471-520. PubMed ID: 11917929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evolving limitations on coverage for AIDS: implications for health insurers and employers under the ADA and ERISA.
Mansfield NR
Tort Insur Law J; 1999; 35(1):117-35. PubMed ID: 11475508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Kassebaum-Kennedy bill--the limits of incrementalism.
Kuttner R
N Engl J Med; 1997 Jul; 337(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 9203434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
Bloche MG
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1277-9. PubMed ID: 15385651
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
