134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16229329)
1. Vasectomy without scalpel.
Nath NC
J Indian Med Assoc; 2005 May; 103(5):258. PubMed ID: 16229329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A new look at male sterilisation (no-scalpel vasectomy) in Orissa.
Patnaik GN
J Indian Med Assoc; 2005 May; 103(5):268-9. PubMed ID: 16229331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. No-scalpel vasectomy--hope for future: historical aspects.
Nemani PK
J Indian Med Assoc; 2005 May; 103(5):270, 272. PubMed ID: 16229332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. No-scalpel vasectomy at a glance.
Nath NC
J Indian Med Assoc; 2005 May; 103(5):273-4, 276-7, 288. PubMed ID: 16229333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No scalpel vasectomy--an overview.
Kaza RC
J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Mar; 104(3):129-30, 132-3, 141. PubMed ID: 16910335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic gastric banding or gastric bypass for morbid obesity?
Allen JW; Tanner B
Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 4(4):178-9. PubMed ID: 17404587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as our bridge to the future?
Egawa S
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1020-1. PubMed ID: 19117664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial comment on: Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
Schips L; Cindolo L
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1169-70. PubMed ID: 19185414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel instrument-independent no-scalpel vasectomy - a comparative study against the standard instrument-dependent no-scalpel vasectomy.
Chen KC
Int J Androl; 2004 Aug; 27(4):222-7. PubMed ID: 15271201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simply modified no-scalpel vasectomy (percutaneous vasectomy)--a comparative study against the standard no-scalpel vasectomy.
Chen KC; Peng CC; Hsieh HM; Chiang HS
Contraception; 2005 Feb; 71(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 15707567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
Kaouk JH; Goel RK
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mini-incision vasectomy reversal using no-scalpel vasectomy principles: efficacy and postoperative pain compared with traditional approaches to vasectomy reversal.
Grober ED; Jarvi K; Lo KC; Shin EJ
Urology; 2011 Mar; 77(3):602-6. PubMed ID: 21185588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. No-scalpel vasectomy: a minimally invasive procedure.
Jow WW; Goldstein M
Contemp Urol; 1993 Apr; 5(4):37-44, 50-2. PubMed ID: 10148523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A minimally invasive vasectomy with the no suture, inline method for vas occlusion.
Marmar JL; Kessler S; Hartanto VH
Int J Fertil Womens Med; 2001; 46(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 11720198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of vasectomy on population control and problems of reanastomosis.
Kashyap KN
Proc R Soc Med; 1973 Jan; 66(1 Pt 1):51-2. PubMed ID: 4690057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgery and marketing: comparing different methods of radical prostatectomy.
Wirth MP; Hakenberg OW
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1031-3. PubMed ID: 19232815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pull-through and open pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease with special reference to postoperative fecal continence.
Fujiwara N; Kaneyama K; Okazaki T; Lane GJ; Kato Y; Kobayashi H; Yamataka A
J Pediatr Surg; 2007 Dec; 42(12):2071-4. PubMed ID: 18082710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of vasectomies performed at a Turkish metropolitan maternity hospital.
Dilbaz B; Cil AP; Gultekin IB; Caliskan E; Kahyaoglu Z; Dilbaz S
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2007 Mar; 12(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 17455040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No scalpel vasectomy advocacy and community mobilisation--a personal experience.
Sharma RP
J Indian Med Assoc; 2006 Mar; 104(3):134, 136-7. PubMed ID: 16910336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Office based vasectomy can be performed by supervised urological residents with patient pain and morbidity comparable to those of a staff surgeon procedure.
Nguyen CT; Hernandez AV; Gao T; Thomas AA; Jones JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1451-4. PubMed ID: 18710737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
