These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16229332)

  • 41. Minimally-invasive esophagomyotomy in 200 consecutive patients: factors influencing postoperative outcomes.
    Schuchert MJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ; Kilic A; Gooding WE; Alvelo-Rivera M; Christie NA; Gilbert S; Pennathur A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 May; 85(5):1729-34. PubMed ID: 18442574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Short-term morbidity following No-Scalpel Vasectomy: an assessment of clients' perceptions by novel postcard system.
    Garg M; Dalela D; Dalela D; Goel A; Kumar M; Paul S; Patil S; Sankhwar SN
    Urologia; 2014; 81(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 24474542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Minimally invasive vasectomy.
    Holt BA; Higgins AF
    Br J Urol; 1996 Apr; 77(4):585-6. PubMed ID: 8777623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Minimally invasive surgery 2006 - 2007.
    Jin J; Rosen M; Ponsky J
    Endoscopy; 2008 Jan; 40(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 18210342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up.
    Murphy DG; Kerger M; Crowe H; Peters JS; Costello AJ
    Eur Urol; 2009 Jun; 55(6):1358-66. PubMed ID: 19147274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Vasectomy. Clinical study of 500 couples].
    Giner J; Zamora G; Ortiz S; Pedrón N
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Jun; 39(236):405-11. PubMed ID: 947824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Minimally invasive surgical approaches to retrovesical structures.
    Passerotti C; Cendron M; Gargollo P; Diamond DA; Borer JG; Cilento B; Bauers S; Retik AB; Peters CA; Nguyen HT
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Dec; 3(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 18200625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Office based vasectomy can be performed by supervised urological residents with patient pain and morbidity comparable to those of a staff surgeon procedure.
    Nguyen CT; Hernandez AV; Gao T; Thomas AA; Jones JS
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1451-4. PubMed ID: 18710737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.
    Raman JD; Bagrodia A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18715694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Single-port laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy.
    Kaouk JH; Goel RK
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19185415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Laparoscopic Ladd procedure: a minimally invasive approach to malrotation without midgut volvulus.
    Draus JM; Foley DS; Bond SJ
    Am Surg; 2007 Jul; 73(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 17674943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Percutaneous no-scalpel vasectomy via one puncture in China.
    Li L; Shao J; Wang X
    Urol J; 2014 May; 11(2):1452-6. PubMed ID: 24807759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Surgical practices for urological tumors: a nation-wide survey in Japan in 2005.
    Kawakami S; Kihara K; ;
    Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):257-62; discussion 262. PubMed ID: 19215318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Re: a comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approachesto vasectomy in 5 countries.
    Morrison GE; Alderman PM
    J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1892-3. PubMed ID: 10799220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Vasectomy in general practice. A report on 100 consecutive cases.
    Hobbs JJ
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1972 Sep; 22(122):583-9. PubMed ID: 5078094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A study on knowledge of married men on no-scalpel vasectomy.
    Nagarajappa D
    Nurs J India; 2005 Oct; 96(10):225-7. PubMed ID: 16572980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Vasectomy: an update.
    Dassow P; Bennett JM
    Am Fam Physician; 2006 Dec; 74(12):2069-74. PubMed ID: 17186713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Thoracoscopic double aortic arch division with Harmonic scalpel: a case report.
    Laje P; Martínez-Ferro M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 133(3):819-20. PubMed ID: 17320599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Techniques of vasectomy.
    Art KS; Nangia AK
    Urol Clin North Am; 2009 Aug; 36(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 19643233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparative study of the no scalpel and standard incision approaches to vasectomy in 5 countries. The Male Sterilization Investigator Team.
    Sokal D; McMullen S; Gates D; Dominik R
    J Urol; 1999 Nov; 162(5):1621-5. PubMed ID: 10524882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.