These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16229743)

  • 1. The activity of French research ethics committees and characteristics of biomedical research protocols involving humans: a retrospective cohort study.
    Decullier E; Lhéritier V; Chapuis F
    BMC Med Ethics; 2005 Oct; 6():E9. PubMed ID: 16229743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
    Dal-Ré R; Espada J; Ortega R
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptability and profile of the clinical drug trials underway in Finnish university hospitals in the 1990s: applications reviewed by ethics committees.
    Keinonen T; Nieminen S; Saareks V; Saano V; Ylitalo P
    Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol; 2001 Sep; 23(7):415-23. PubMed ID: 11771857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should local research ethics committees monitor research they have approved?
    Pickworth E
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Oct; 26(5):330-3. PubMed ID: 11055034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study.
    Decullier E; Lhéritier V; Chapuis F
    BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7507):19. PubMed ID: 15967761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Problematic protocols: An overview of medical research protocols not approved by the LUMC medical ethics review committee.
    Tersmette DG; Engberts DP
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 28949866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees.
    Benfatto G; ; ; Drago F
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):40. PubMed ID: 33827541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nature and extent of changes in the patient's information sheets of international multicentre clinical trials as requested by Spanish Research Ethics Committees.
    Dal-Ré R; Morejón E; Ortega R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2004 Dec; 123(20):770-4. PubMed ID: 15607068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing potential participants of local research ethics committee approval of research protocols.
    Beyleveld D; Longley D
    Med Law Int; 1998; 3(2-3):209-22. PubMed ID: 11657596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local research ethics committees. Widely differing responses to a national survey protocol.
    Harries UJ; Fentem PH; Tuxworth W; Hoinville GW
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 8006869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An appraisal of the process of protocol review by an ethics review conmmittee in a tertiary institution in Ibadan.
    Eyelade OR; Ajuwon AJ; Adebamowo CA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2011 Jun; 40(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 22195386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research ethics review at University Eduardo Mondlane (UEM)/Maputo Central Hospital, Mozambique (2013-2016): a descriptive analysis of the start-up of a new research ethics committee (REC).
    Sacarlal J; Muchanga V; Mabutana C; Mabui M; Mariamo A; Cuamba AJ; Fumo LA; Silveira J; Heitman E; Moon TD
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 May; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 29792193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of ethics committees based on authors' disclosures: cross-sectional study of articles published in the European Journal of Anaesthesiology and a survey of ethics committees.
    Zoccatelli D; Tramèr MR; Elia N
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 29884170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reviewing the reviewers: a survey of institutional ethics committees in Australia.
    McNeill PM; Berglund CA; Webster IW
    Med J Aust; 1990 Mar; 152(6):289-96. PubMed ID: 2314331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research ethics committees in Japan: A perspective from thirty years of experience at Tokushima University.
    Yanagawa H; Katashima R; Takeda N
    J Med Invest; 2015; 62(3-4):114-8. PubMed ID: 26399332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
    Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pharmaceutical trials in general practice: the first 100 protocols. An audit by the clinical research ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
    Wise P; Drury M
    BMJ; 1996 Nov; 313(7067):1245-8. PubMed ID: 8939118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Panel faults research consent process.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1995 Oct; 270(5233):25. PubMed ID: 7569945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review.
    van Lent M; Rongen GA; Out HJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Dec; 15():83. PubMed ID: 25490963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees.
    Ahmed AH; Nicholson KG
    J Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; 22(5):263-6. PubMed ID: 8910776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.