These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16230070)
1. Comparing risks and benefits of colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients. Ko CW; Sonnenberg A Gastroenterology; 2005 Oct; 129(4):1163-70. PubMed ID: 16230070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia. Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Periodic health examination, 1994 update: 2. Screening strategies for colorectal cancer. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Solomon MJ; McLeod RS CMAJ; 1994 Jun; 150(12):1961-70. PubMed ID: 7980760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients: when should be more useful? Pasetto LM; Monfardini S Cancer Treat Rev; 2007 Oct; 33(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17553621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach. Wong SS; Leong AP; Leong TY Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):104-10. PubMed ID: 15360784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A cost analysis of screening methodology for family members of colorectal cancer patients. Rozen P; Ron E Am J Gastroenterol; 1989 Dec; 84(12):1548-51. PubMed ID: 2512809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relevance of unrelated costs internal and external to the healthcare sector to the outcome of a cost-comparison analysis of secondary prevention: the case of general colorectal cancer screening in the German population. Tscheulin DK; Drevs F Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Apr; 11(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19449159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening methods. Brenner H Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Apr; 46 Suppl 1():S20-2. PubMed ID: 18368634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colorectal cancer screening in young patients with poor health and severe comorbidity. Sultan S; Conway J; Edelman D; Dudley T; Provenzale D Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2209-14. PubMed ID: 17101938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal cancer test use among persons aged > or = 50 years--United States, 2001. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2003 Mar; 52(10):193-6. PubMed ID: 12653456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey of the opinions, knowledge, and practices of gastroenterologists regarding colorectal cancer screening and use of the fecal occult blood test. Sharma VK; Corder FA; Fancher J; Howden CW Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Dec; 95(12):3629-32. PubMed ID: 11151904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs. El-Serag HB; Petersen L; Hampel H; Richardson P; Cooper G Arch Intern Med; 2006 Nov; 166(20):2202-8. PubMed ID: 17101937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Ioannou GN; Chapko MK; Dominitz JA Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2082-91. PubMed ID: 14499792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Recommendations on population screening for colorectal cancer in New Zealand. Members of the National Health Committee Working Party on Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer. N Z Med J; 1999 Jan; 112(1080):4-6. PubMed ID: 10073156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Many participants in fecal occult blood test population screening have a higher-than-average risk for colorectal cancer. Worthley DL; Smith A; Bampton PA; Cole SR; Young GP Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1079-83. PubMed ID: 16957514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Individual screening for colorectal cancer: which strategy for which patient?]. Demols A; Van Laethem JL; Gay F; Franchimont D; Adler M; Van Gossum A Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A203-9. PubMed ID: 11680174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: evidence from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Subramanian S; Amonkar MM; Hunt TL Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):409-16. PubMed ID: 15734966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer. Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of colorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Mar; 57(10):253-8. PubMed ID: 18340331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]