165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16230232)
1. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: a case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses.
Jenny JY; Clemens U; Kohler S; Kiefer H; Konermann W; Miehlke RK
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7):832-9. PubMed ID: 16230232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation.
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Comput Aided Surg; 2001; 6(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 11835617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation].
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Nov; 87(7):645-52. PubMed ID: 11845067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differing prosthetic alignment and femoral component sizing between 2 computer-assisted CT-free navigation systems in TKA.
Matsumoto T; Kubo S; Muratsu H; Tsumura N; Ishida K; Matsushita T; Takayama K; Sasaki H; Oka S; Kurosaka M; Kuroda R
Orthopedics; 2011 Dec; 34(12):e860-5. PubMed ID: 22146202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Computer-assisted total-knee arthroplasty. Comparison of two successive systems. Learning curve].
Bové JC
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 18456060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experience with computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty in a community setting.
Carter RE; Rush PF; Smid JA; Smith WL
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 18534523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
Seon JK; Song EK
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experience using the latest OrthoPilot TKA software: a comparative study.
Clemens U; Miehlke RK
Surg Technol Int; 2003; 11():265-73. PubMed ID: 12931310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning curve in navigated total knee replacement. A multi-centre study comparing experienced and beginner centres.
Jenny JY; Miehlke RK; Giurea A
Knee; 2008 Mar; 15(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 18262789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment.
Kim SJ; MacDonald M; Hernandez J; Wixson RL
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):123-31. PubMed ID: 16214013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Rotational alignment of femoral component with computed-assisted surgery (CAS) during total knee arthroplasty].
Michaut M; Beaufils P; Galaud B; Abadie P; Boisrenoult P; Fallet L
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 18929753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation.
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2003 Jan; 11(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 12548450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of navigation-guided gap technique in total knee arthroplasty.
Han SB; Nha KW; Yoon JR; Lee DH; Chae IJ
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10 Suppl 1):. PubMed ID: 19298036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of intra-operative measurement of the mechanical axes of the lower limb during total knee replacement with a non-image-based navigation system.
Jenny JY; Boeri C; Picard F; Leitner F
Comput Aided Surg; 2004; 9(4):161-5. PubMed ID: 16192056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy.
Martin A; Wohlgenannt O; Prenn M; Oelsch C; von Strempel A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():178-84. PubMed ID: 17620811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement.
Jenny JY; Ciobanu E; Boeri C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():58-62. PubMed ID: 17572633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Accuracy improvement of acetabular component placement using non-image based surgical navigation system].
Yu Z; Wang L; Gui J
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1057-61. PubMed ID: 17990769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
