These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16230312)

  • 1. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources.
    Greenhalgh T; Peacock R
    BMJ; 2005 Nov; 331(7524):1064-5. PubMed ID: 16230312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Innovations in data collection, management, and archiving for systematic reviews.
    Li T; Vedula SS; Hadar N; Parkin C; Lau J; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 25686168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manual search approaches used by systematic reviewers in dermatology.
    Vassar M; Atakpo P; Kash MJ
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Oct; 104(4):302-304. PubMed ID: 27822152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: validation showed the noninferiority of the objective approach.
    Hausner E; Guddat C; Hermanns T; Lampert U; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 25464826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMJ; 2005 Jan; 330(7482):68. PubMed ID: 15619601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?
    Aagaard T; Lund H; Juhl C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):161. PubMed ID: 27875992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Searching for evidence or approval? A commentary on database search in systematic reviews and alternative information retrieval methodologies.
    Delaney A; Tamás PA
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 29106042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A guide to obtain validity and reproducibility in systematic reviews].
    Frandsen TF; Dyrvig AK; Christensen JB; Fasterholdt I; Oelholm AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Mar; 176(7):. PubMed ID: 25096352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Cogo E; Grimshaw J; Moher D; Lefebvre C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):944-52. PubMed ID: 19230612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heterogeneity in search strategies among Cochrane acupuncture reviews: is there room for improvement?
    Lui S; Smith EJ; Terplan M
    Acupunct Med; 2010 Sep; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 20615852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic evidence retrieval for systematic reviews.
    Choong MK; Galgani F; Dunn AG; Tsafnat G
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e223. PubMed ID: 25274020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response to letter by Boeker et al. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: further issues regarding the objective and conceptual approaches.
    Hausner E; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():255-7. PubMed ID: 26142113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semi-automating the manual literature search for systematic reviews increases efficiency.
    Chapman AL; Morgan LC; Gartlehner G
    Health Info Libr J; 2010 Mar; 27(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20402801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of search strategies for systematic reviews: reply to commentary by Dintsios and Niederstadt (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-199).
    Hausner E; Waffenschmidt S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():259-61. PubMed ID: 26093311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information retrieval for the Cochrane systematic reviews: the case of breast cancer surgery.
    Cognetti G; Grossi L; Lucon A; Solimini R
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2015; 51(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25857382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study.
    Bramer WM; Giustini D; Kramer BM
    Syst Rev; 2016 Mar; 5():39. PubMed ID: 26932789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews.
    Sampson M; McGowan J; Tetzlaff J; Cogo E; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):748-54. PubMed ID: 18586178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Literature search methodology for systematic reviews: conventional and natural language processing enabled methods are complementary (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:191-9).
    Boeker M; Motschall E; Vach W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():253-5. PubMed ID: 26117425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the effectiveness of simplified search strategies for updating systematic reviews.
    Rice M; Ali MU; Fitzpatrick-Lewis D; Kenny M; Raina P; Sherifali D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 88():148-153. PubMed ID: 28625563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques.
    Papaioannou D; Sutton A; Carroll C; Booth A; Wong R
    Health Info Libr J; 2010 Jun; 27(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 20565552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.