These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623033)
21. Risk of clot formation with ionic and nonionic contrast media in cerebral angiography. Tama Contrast Media Study Group. Sato E; Saito I Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):925-8. PubMed ID: 8959182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Adverse reactions following two separate intravascular injections of contrast media in the same patient. A comparison between iohexol and monomeric ionic media. Sogn EE; OdegÄrd T; Haider T; Andrew E Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 2952151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention. Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness of iodixanol in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy. Aspelin P; Aubry P; Fransson SG; Strasser R; Willenbrock R; Lundkvist J Am Heart J; 2005 Feb; 149(2):298-303. PubMed ID: 15846268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Nonionic versus ionic contrast media in intravenous urography: clinical trial in 1,000 consecutive patients. Jacobsson BF; Jorulf H; Kalantar MS; Narasimham DL Radiology; 1988 Jun; 167(3):601-5. PubMed ID: 3283830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Variable effects of radiological contrast media on thrombus growth in a rabbit jugular vein thrombosis model. Levi M; Biemond BJ; Sturk A; Hoek J; ten Cate JW Thromb Haemost; 1991 Aug; 66(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 1771615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adverse reactions following administration of contrast media for diagnostic imaging in anaesthetized dogs and cats: a retrospective study. Scarabelli S; Cripps P; Rioja E; Alderson B Vet Anaesth Analg; 2016 Sep; 43(5):502-10. PubMed ID: 26782994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: randomized, prospective study comparing a low- and high-osmolality contrast agent. Sherman S; Hawes RH; Rathgaber SW; Uzer MF; Smith MT; Khusro QE; Silverman WB; Earle DT; Lehman GA Gastrointest Endosc; 1994; 40(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 7926531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of contrast agents for endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Barkin JS; Casal GL; Reiner DK; Goldberg RI; Phillips RS; Kaplan S Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Oct; 86(10):1437-41. PubMed ID: 1928034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of severe adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media in Japan: evaluation of pretesting. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Yamaguchi K; Katayama H; Takashima T; Kozuka T; Seez P; Matsuura K Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):363-7. PubMed ID: 1987594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Iohexol and ioxaglate in peripheral angiography. Stiris MG; Laerum F Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(6):767-70. PubMed ID: 2962617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the effect of non-ionic and ionic contrast agents on pancreatic histology in a canine model. Pfau PR; Mosley RG; Said A; Gopal DV; Fischer MC; Oberley T; Weiss J; Lee FT; Eckoff D; Reichelderfer M JOP; 2006 Jan; 7(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 16407615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Percutaneous coronary angioscopic comparison of thrombus formation during percutaneous coronary angioplasty with ionic and nonionic low osmolality contrast media in unstable angina. Qureshi NR; den Heijer P; Crijns HJ Am J Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 80(6):700-4. PubMed ID: 9315572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study]. Schmiedel E Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Iodixanol in paediatric gastrointestinal imaging: safety and efficacy comparison with iohexol. Wright NB; Carty HM; Sprigg A; Kampenes VB; Friis M; Petersen KK; Stake G; Klaveness AJ Br J Radiol; 2002 Feb; 75(890):127-35. PubMed ID: 11893636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Prospects of the use of non-ionic X-ray contrast substances during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography]. Sviridov NK; Napolov IuK Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2003; (6):62-3. PubMed ID: 14674360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The comparative effects of ionic versus nonionic agents in cardiac catheterization. Benotti JR Invest Radiol; 1988 Nov; 23 Suppl 2():S366-73. PubMed ID: 3058641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]