These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623038)

  • 1. Evaluation of teleradiology for interpretation of intravenous urograms.
    Halpern EJ; Newhouse JH; Amis ES; Lubetsky HW; Jaffe RM; Esser PD; Alderson PO
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 May; 5(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 1623038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized follow-up of discrepancies in image interpretation between emergency and radiology departments.
    Siegel E; Groleau G; Reiner B; Stair T
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9735425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
    Arenson RL; Andriole KP; Avrin DE; Gould RG
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Teleradiography for diagnosis in emergency care. A clinical experience].
    Nani MT; Niccolai F; Vannucchi L; Pacini P; Piperno G
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 1455030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Teleradiology and picture archiving and communications systems: changed pattern of communication between clinicians and radiologists.
    Aas IH; Geitung JT
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():20-2. PubMed ID: 16035982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of interpretation of CT scans: comparing PACS monitor displays and hard-copy images.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1407-10. PubMed ID: 12438025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.
    Parasyn A; Hanson RM; Peat JK; De Silva M
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Feb; 11(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9502325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Picture archiving and communication systems and related developments in Sweden.
    Olsson S
    J Digit Imaging; 1991 Aug; 4(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 1911970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a quadtree-based compression algorithm with digitized urograms.
    Halpern EJ; Newhouse JH; Amis ES; Levy HM; Lubetsky HW
    Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 2928534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ROC-study of a teleradiology workstation versus film readings.
    Størmer J; Bolle SR; Sund T; Weller GE; Gitlin JN
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jan; 38(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 9059424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a PACS workstation with conventional film for interpretation of neonatal examinations: a paired comparison study.
    Franken EA; Smith WL; Berbaum KS; Kao SC; Sato Y
    Pediatr Radiol; 1991; 21(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 1891258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical decision making using teleradiology in urology.
    Lee BR; Allaf M; Moore R; Bohlman M; Wang GM; Bishoff JT; Jackman SV; Cadeddu JA; Jarrett TW; Khazan R; Kavoussi LR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 9888731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design of a high-speed, high-resolution teleradiology network.
    Stewart BK; Dwyer SJ; Kangarloo H
    J Digit Imaging; 1992 Aug; 5(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 1520740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance of picture archiving communication systems with laser film digitizers.
    Esser PD; Halpern EJ; Amis ES
    J Digit Imaging; 1991 Nov; 4(4):248-50. PubMed ID: 1772918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New high-resolution teleradiology system: prospective study of diagnostic accuracy in 685 transmitted clinical cases.
    Goldberg MA; Rosenthal DI; Chew FS; Blickman JG; Miller SW; Mueller PR
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):429-34. PubMed ID: 8421746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FEASIBLE (II): Its use in an actual PACS evaluation study.
    Ottes FP; de Valk JP; Winter LH
    Med Inform (Lond); 1988; 13(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 3246910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography during excretory urography: our experience.
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2085269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does PACS improve diagnostic accuracy in chest radiograph interpretations in clinical practice?
    Hurlen P; Borthne A; Dahl FA; Ostbye T; Gulbrandsen P
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 20888718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Picture archiving and communication system--Part one: Filmless radiology and distance radiology.
    De Backer AI; Mortelé KJ; De Keulenaer BL
    JBR-BTR; 2004; 87(5):234-41. PubMed ID: 15587562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Modular project of the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Preliminary operational experience. I].
    Dalla Palma L; Ukovich W; Stacul F; Cuttin Zernich R; Carbi N; Giribona P
    Radiol Med; 1990; 80(1-2):9-17. PubMed ID: 2217948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.