These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16231114)

  • 1. Potential and limitations of cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial bone movement in the case of LeFort III-distraction.
    Lippold C; Danesh G; Meyer U; Hohoff A; Kelker M; Kleinheinz J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Sep; 66(5):388-96. PubMed ID: 16231114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Distraction osteogenesis in the midface. Indications, technique and first long-term results].
    Kessler P; Kloss F; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Wiltfang J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2003; 113(6):677-92. PubMed ID: 12872591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of distraction osteogenesis to the maxillofacial skeleton.
    Cheung LK
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2000 Oct; 15():159-62. PubMed ID: 11709929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Distraction osteogenesis and orofacial anomalies].
    Jansma J; Becking AG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Jun; 115(6):324-30. PubMed ID: 18618986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sutural distraction osteogenesis (SDO) versus osteotomy distraction osteogenesis (ODO) for midfacial advancement: a new technique and primary clinical report.
    Liu C; Hou M; Liang L; Huang X; Zhang T; Zhang H; Ma X; Song R
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):537-48. PubMed ID: 16077296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skeletal changes after midface surgery in patients with craniofacial deformities: a three-dimensional quantification method.
    Rostamzad P; Abdel-Alim T; El Ghoul K; Wolvius EB; van Veelen MC; Loudon SE; Pleumeekers MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Sep; 53(9):752-762. PubMed ID: 38594167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of treatment outcome and stability between distraction osteogenesis and LeFort I osteotomy in cleft patients with maxillary hypoplasia.
    Baek SH; Lee JK; Lee JH; Kim MJ; Kim JR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 18(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 17912117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis.
    Hopper RA
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Aug; 20(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 22894998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Trans-facial distraction of the facial skull at the LeFort III level].
    Kübler A; Zöller J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2002 May; 6(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12143126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction osteogenesis of the midface: a new implantable distraction device.
    Lin KY; Bill TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1999; 9(4):413-23. PubMed ID: 10847977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multivectorial, external halo-assisted midface distraction in patients with severe hypoplasia.
    Malagon HH; Romo GW; Quintero Mosqueda FR; Magaña FG
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Nov; 19(6):1663-9. PubMed ID: 19098577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: modification of the intraoral splint in the rigid external distraction.
    Lim H; Ko EW; Lo LJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):856-8. PubMed ID: 22565908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [3-dimensional position changes of periorbital structures after midface distraction osteogenesis].
    Yu ZY; Mu XZ; Han JY
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 24(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 19241699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined internal and external Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis--the "elusive vector".
    Wall SA; Butler L; Byren J; Carls PF; Greenwood S; McKnight M; Middleton J; Saeed N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1806-8. PubMed ID: 19816354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rotation advancement of the midface by distraction osteogenesis.
    Denny AD; Kalantarian B; Hanson PR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 May; 111(6):1789-99; discussion 1800-3. PubMed ID: 12711938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis.
    Winters R; Tatum SA
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 22(4):653-64. PubMed ID: 25444735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transsutural distraction osteogenesis versus osteotemy distraction osteogenesis.
    Liu C; Liu C; Gao Q; Hou M; Li G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):464-71. PubMed ID: 22421870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature.
    Nout E; Cesteleyn LL; van der Wal KG; van Adrichem LN; Mathijssen IM; Wolvius EB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 37(9):781-9. PubMed ID: 18486452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Submental intubation: surgical and anesthesiological aspects].
    Koudstaal MJ; van der Wal KG; Mallios C; Rupreht J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Feb; 147(5):199-202. PubMed ID: 12645353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.