These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16231493)

  • 1. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review.
    Soares CJ; Soares PV; Pereira JC; Fonseca RB
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2005; 17(4):224-35. PubMed ID: 16231493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Composite Inlays and Onlays: A Literature Review.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Casinelli M; Frascaria M; De Angelis F; Vadini M; D'Amario M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Sep; 36(8):570-7; quiz 578. PubMed ID: 26355440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for the successful placement of laboratory-processed, indirect composite restorations.
    Alex G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 Aug; 24(8 Suppl):43-7; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 14692220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing form, function, and natural aesthetics with laboratory-processed composite resin--part II.
    Terry DA; Leinfelder KF; Maragos C
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Aug; 17(7):449-54; quiz 456. PubMed ID: 18655333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Atmospheric moisture effects on the testing rate and cementation seating load following resin-strengthening of a soda lime glass analogue for dental porcelain.
    Hooi P; Addison O; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1208-13. PubMed ID: 24012519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear bond strength of different types of luting cements to an aluminum oxide-reinforced glass ceramic core material.
    Begazo CC; de Boer HD; Kleverlaan CJ; van Waas MA; Feilzer AJ
    Dent Mater; 2004 Dec; 20(10):901-7. PubMed ID: 15501317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic inlays and onlays.
    Jackson RD
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment on roughness and bond strength of a heat-pressed ceramic.
    Ayad MF; Fahmy NZ; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 18262013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength.
    Roulet JF; Söderholm KJ; Longmate J
    J Dent Res; 1995 Jan; 74(1):381-7. PubMed ID: 7876433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of two abrasive systems on resin bonding to laboratory-processed indirect resin composite restorations.
    Bouschlicher MR; Cobb DS; Vargas MA
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):185-96. PubMed ID: 10825875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of surface conditioning with airborne-particle abrasion on the tensile strength of polymeric CAD/CAM crowns luted with self-adhesive and conventional resin cements.
    Stawarczyk B; Basler T; Ender A; Roos M; Ozcan M; Hämmerle C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 22304743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations.
    Koczarski MJ
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1998 May; 10(4):405-12; quiz 414. PubMed ID: 9655047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors affecting the cement-post interface.
    Zicari F; De Munck J; Scotti R; Naert I; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 22169674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
    Molin MK; Karlsson SL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure?
    Reston EG; Filho SC; Arossi G; Cogo RB; Rocha Cdos S; Closs LQ
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 18666506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adhesive cementation of chairside CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Blatz MB; Ripps A; Sadan A; Holst S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):60, 62-5; quiz 65. PubMed ID: 16471400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a soda-lime glass be used to demonstrate how patterns of strength dependence are influenced by pre-cementation and resin-cementation variables?
    Hooi P; Addison O; Fleming GJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 22561646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.