BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16232380)

  • 21. Risk assessment and guidelines for first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Crawford J
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Apr; 20(5 Suppl 4):22-8. PubMed ID: 16736985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modeling the cost effectiveness of secondary febrile neutropenia prophylaxis during standard-dose chemotherapy.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; Adang EM; Termeer E; Severens JL; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 18182670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cost considerations in therapy with myeloid growth factors.
    Glaspy JA; Jakway J
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Jul; 50(7 Suppl 3):S19-26. PubMed ID: 7689789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Prognostic factors for febrile neutropenia].
    Ray-Coquard I; Borg C; Bachelot T; Fayette J; Zufferey L; Guastalla JP; Ghesquière H; Blay JY; Sebban C; Marec-Bérard P; Biron P
    Bull Cancer; 2006 May; 93(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 16777629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal use of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor in patients with cancer who are at risk for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.
    Cappozzo C
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2004 May; 31(3):569-76. PubMed ID: 15146222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. First-Cycle CSF use in breast cancer and NHL: guidelines and recommendations.
    Al-Kali A; Ozer H
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 Dec; 20(14 Suppl 9):7-12. PubMed ID: 17370923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Strategies for minimizing complications of neutropenia: prophylactic myeloid growth factors or antibiotics.
    Wingard JR; Elmongy M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 19237297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: risks, consequences, and new directions for its management.
    Crawford J; Dale DC; Lyman GH
    Cancer; 2004 Jan; 100(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 14716755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim primary prophylaxis in women with early-stage breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in the United States.
    Lyman GH; Lalla A; Barron RL; Dubois RW
    Clin Ther; 2009 May; 31(5):1092-104. PubMed ID: 19539110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are shorter courses of filgrastim prophylaxis associated with increased risk of hospitalization?
    Weycker D; Hackett J; Edelsberg JS; Oster G; Glass AG
    Ann Pharmacother; 2006 Mar; 40(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 16492793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use and effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in primary prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia in the outpatient setting.
    Tuffaha HW; Treish IM; Zaru L
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2008 Sep; 14(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 18524866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Review of the value of colony stimulating factors for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenic episodes in adult patients treated for haematological malignancies.
    Levenga TH; Timmer-Bonte JN
    Br J Haematol; 2007 Jul; 138(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 17593021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Granulocyte growth factors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Grossi F; Tiseo M
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 16697211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. When the risk of febrile neutropenia is 20%, prophylactic colony-stimulating factor use is clinically effective, but is it cost-effective?
    Adams JR; Angelotta C; Bennett CL
    J Clin Oncol; 2006 Jul; 24(19):2975-7. PubMed ID: 16682722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pegfilgrastim administered on the same day with dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is associated with a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia as compared to conventional growth factor support: matched case-control study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Skarlos DV; Timotheadou E; Galani E; Samantas E; Grimani I; Lianos E; Aravantinos G; Xanthakis I; Pentheroudakis G; Pectasides D; Fountzilas G
    Oncology; 2009; 77(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19622901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Role of colony stimulating factors (CSFs) in solid tumours: results of an expert panel.
    Gridelli C; Aapro MS; Barni S; Beretta GD; Colucci G; Daniele B; Del Mastro L; Di Maio M; De Petris L; Perrone F; Thatcher N; De Marinis F
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2007 Jul; 63(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 17368037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neutropenia: state of the knowledge part I.
    Nirenberg A; Bush AP; Davis A; Friese CR; Gillespie TW; Rice RD
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 2006 Nov; 33(6):1193-201. PubMed ID: 17149402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predictors of reduced dose intensity in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.
    Shayne M; Crawford J; Dale DC; Culakova E; Lyman GH;
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 16705366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in lung cancer patients: the role of antibiotic prophylaxis.
    Kouranos V; Dimopoulos G; Vassias A; Syrigos KN
    Cancer Lett; 2011 Dec; 313(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 21955615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by prophylactic antibiotics plus or minus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch Randomized Phase III Study.
    Timmer-Bonte JN; de Boo TM; Smit HJ; Biesma B; Wilschut FA; Cheragwandi SA; Termeer A; Hensing CA; Akkermans J; Adang EM; Bootsma GP; Tjan-Heijnen VC
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(31):7974-84. PubMed ID: 16258098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.