162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1623431)
1. The role of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Brendler CB; Walsh PC
CA Cancer J Clin; 1992; 42(4):212-22. PubMed ID: 1623431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Functional results of various surgical techniques for radical prostatectomy].
Michl U; Graefen M; Noldus J; Eggert T; Huland H
Urologe A; 2003 Sep; 42(9):1196-202. PubMed ID: 14504752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective evaluation of combined oncological and functional outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control at 2 years.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jan; 107(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 20575978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Functional results and treatment of functional dysfunctions after radical prostatectomy].
Salomon L; Droupy S; Yiou R; Soulié M
Prog Urol; 2015 Nov; 25(15):1028-66. PubMed ID: 26519966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial.
Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G;
Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial comment on: Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
van der Poel HG
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):561-2. PubMed ID: 17683855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary and sexual function after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.
Stanford JL; Feng Z; Hamilton AS; Gilliland FD; Stephenson RA; Eley JW; Albertsen PC; Harlan LC; Potosky AL
JAMA; 2000 Jan; 283(3):354-60. PubMed ID: 10647798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years.
Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1831-6. PubMed ID: 7523730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ficarra V; Borghesi M; Suardi N; De Naeyer G; Novara G; Schatteman P; De Groote R; Carpentier P; Mottrie A
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 23470027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Indications and results of radical prostatectomy].
Jacqmin D
Cancer Radiother; 1997; 1(5):418-22. PubMed ID: 9587371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Critical Analysis of the Current Knowledge of Surgical Anatomy of the Prostate Related to Optimisation of Cancer Control and Preservation of Continence and Erection in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: An Update.
Walz J; Epstein JI; Ganzer R; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Kaouk J; Menon M; Mottrie A; Myers RP; Patel V; Tewari A; Villers A; Artibani W
Eur Urol; 2016 Aug; 70(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 26850969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional and oncological outcomes of patients aged <50 years treated with radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in a European population.
Becker A; Tennstedt P; Hansen J; Trinh QD; Kluth L; Atassi N; Schlomm T; Salomon G; Haese A; Budaeus L; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Steuber T
BJU Int; 2014 Jul; 114(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 24053677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Surgical aspects and innovations in localized prostate cancer].
Coulange C
Cancer Radiother; 2005 Nov; 9(6-7):374-6. PubMed ID: 16176882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Contribution of robotic support, functional and oncological outcomes].
Hoepffner JL; Gaston R; Mugnier C; Rey D; Lopez L; Roche JB; Riviere J; Piechaud PT
Bull Cancer; 2016 May; 103(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 26995400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined reporting of cancer control and functional results of radical prostatectomy.
Salomon L; Saint F; Anastasiadis AG; Sebe P; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Eur Urol; 2003 Dec; 44(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 14644116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeat prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy do not impact erectile function recovery and mid- to long-term continence.
Furrer MA; Vilaseca A; Corradi RB; Boxler S; Thalmann GN; Nguyen DP
Prostate; 2018 Jun; 78(8):631-636. PubMed ID: 29542169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
