BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

502 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16234576)

  • 1. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
    Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized, multisite clinical evaluation of a transparent absorbent acrylic dressing and a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of Stage II and shallow Stage III pressure ulcers.
    Brown-Etris M; Milne C; Orsted H; Gates JL; Netsch D; Punchello M; Couture N; Albert M; Attrell E; Freyberg J
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Apr; 21(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 18385577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.
    Günes UY
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):48-52. PubMed ID: 19471048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pressure ulcers. Local wound care.
    Goode PS; Thomas DR
    Clin Geriatr Med; 1997 Aug; 13(3):543-52. PubMed ID: 9227943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a new synthetic polymer sheet wound dressing.
    Motta G; Dunham L; Dye T; Mentz J; O'Connell-Gifford E; Smith E
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Oct; 45(10):41, 44-6, 48-49. PubMed ID: 10687651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of pressure ulcers: results of a study comparing evidence and practice.
    Helberg D; Mertens E; Halfens RJ; Dassen T
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 Aug; 52(8):60-72. PubMed ID: 16896239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure ulcers--randomised controlled trial comparing hydrocolloid and saline gauze dressings.
    Chang KW; Alsagoff S; Ong KT; Sim PH
    Med J Malaysia; 1998 Dec; 53(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 10971989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical study comparing a hydrocellular dressing to a hydrocolloid dressing in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Seeley J; Jensen JL; Hutcherson J
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jun; 45(6):39-44, 46-7. PubMed ID: 10655861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Managing sacral pressure ulcers with hydrocolloid dressings: results of a controlled, clinical study.
    Day A; Dombranski S; Farkas C; Foster C; Godin J; Moody M; Morrison M; Tamer C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Mar; 41(2):52-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 7598778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay.
    Baharestani MM; Houliston-Otto DB; Barnes S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):48-53. PubMed ID: 19037137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. "Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Branom R; Rappl LM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Sep; 47(9):38-46. PubMed ID: 11889743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of a hydrogel dressing compared with standard management of pressure ulcers.
    Kaya AZ; Turani N; Akyüz M
    J Wound Care; 2005 Jan; 14(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 15656468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic pressure wound therapy in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
    Thomas R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 19037138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Treatment of chronic skin ulcers in the elderly. Descriptive study on the use of a hydrocellular dressing].
    Martínez Cuervo F; Franco Gútiez T; López Rebordinos MT; Menéndez Menéndez S; Rodríguez Rodríguez B
    Rev Enferm; 1998 Dec; 21(244):51-60. PubMed ID: 10076470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two methods of managing pressure ulcers.
    Colwell JC; Foreman MD; Trotter JP
    Decubitus; 1993 Jul; 6(4):28-36. PubMed ID: 8297488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full-thickness pressure ulcers: patient and wound healing characteristics.
    van Rijswijk L
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 8427640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
    Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Micronized, particulate dermal matrix to manage a non-healing pressure ulcer with undermined wound edges: a case report.
    Allam RC
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Apr; 53(4):78-82. PubMed ID: 17449918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting outcomes for stage IV pressure ulcer healing: a proposal.
    Brown GS
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 12669674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized controlled study of Hydrofiber dressing containing ionic silver or calcium alginate dressings in non-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers.
    Jude EB; Apelqvist J; Spraul M; Martini J;
    Diabet Med; 2007 Mar; 24(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 17305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.